MDL No. 2357 - IN RE: Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
Filing
202
ORDER denying without prejudice 122 Motion to Dismiss and 124 Motion to Strike; granting 191 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
IN RE ZAPPOS.COM INC., CUSTOMER
DATA SECURITY BREACH
LITIGATION
8
)
)
)
)
)
3:12-cv-325-RCJ-VPC
ORDER
9
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 122) and
10
Defendant’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 124). The Court also considers Plaintiff’s Joint Motion
11
for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 191).
12
This case arises from a security breach that allegedly compromised the private
13
information of Defendant’s customers including names, addresses, and credit card tails. (Preira
14
Second Am. Compl. ¶ 32, ECF No. 118). The parties report that they are making good progress
15
towards settlement, (ECF Nos. 195, 200), and they have stipulated to stay the proceedings until
16
January 2015 pending further mediation, (ECF No. 201). Therefore, the Court, without
17
expressing any position on the merits of the case, denies without prejudice Defendant’s motions.
18
The Court grants Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for the appointment of counsel.
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 122) and its
Motion to Strike (ECF No. 124) are DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF
NO. 191) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: _______________________
September 18, 2014
9
10
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?