Fernandez v. Centric et al

Filing 205

ORDER granting in part and denying in part as moot Plaintiff's 202 Motion to Extend Time. Replies as to 159 , 160 , 164 , and 167 Motions due by 9/13/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 08/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
KEVIN FERNANDEZ,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DR. CENTRIC, et al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )

3:12-cv-401-LRH-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
August 29, 2013

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:

KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff's "Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Reply Briefs to
Motions (Doc. # 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 167) (First Request)." (Doc. # 202.) This court’s
order (Doc. # 200) already denied Plaintiff’s motions ## 161, 163 and 165. Therefore, Plaintiff’s
request for an extension of time to reply relative to those motions is DENIED as moot.
Plaintiff’s motion for a 14 day extension to reply to Defendant’s responses is GRANTED
as to Doc. ## 159, 160, 164 and 167.
Plaintiff’s seeks an extension as to Doc. # 162. Doc. # 162 was entitled “Motion to Compel,
Motion for Sanctions, and Motion to Exceed Number of Interrogatories Nunc Pro Tunc as it Relates
to Interrogatories.” The clerk’s office logged in Plaintiff’s consolidated motion as three separate
motions. Doc. # 162 is the document wherein Plaintiff seeks to exceed the number of interrogatories
he may serve on the Defendants. This court’s order (Doc. #200) precludes Plaintiff’s ability to serve
any additional discovery until Senior District Judge Hicks rules on Plaintiff’s motion to amend. (Id.
at 2-3.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for an extension as it relates to Doc. # 162 is DENIED as
moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk