Fernandez v. Centric et al

Filing 255

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 1/24/2014, denying as moot Plaintiff's 254 motion to clarify. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA KEVIN FERNANDEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DR. CENTRIC, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) 3:12-cv-401-LRH-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT January 24, 2014 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Clarify Order From January 16, 2014 Hearing. (Doc. # 254.) The issue which Plaintiff seeks the court to clarify, i.e.,the deadline for Defendants to provide supplemental discovery responses, was addressed in this court’s January 17, 2014 Order (Doc. # 253). It appears Plaintiff’s motion which he signed on January 19, 2014, and this court’s Order of January 17, 2014 (Doc # 253), may have crossed paths in the mail. Although the court presumes Plaintiff has now received its January 17, 2014 Order, the deadline for the Defendants to provide their supplemental responses to the Plaintiff’s discovery was “not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order.” (Doc. # 253.) Plaintiff’s motion to clarify (Doc. # 254) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?