Capri v. Cox et al
Filing
93
ORDER adopting and accepting 79 Report and Recommendation; granting Defendants' 66 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing Count III; denying as moot 70 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Gedney; granting nunc p ro tunc 78 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply; granting 84 Motion for Leave to File Exhibit B Under Seal; denying as moot 88 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Opposition; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
RICHARD CAPRI,
9
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-00417-RCJ-VPC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
10
v.
11
JAMES COX, et al.,
12
Defendants.
___________________________________
13
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#791) entered on
14
15
July 1, 2014, recommending that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#66) be granted.
16
Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Report and Recommendation (#83) on August 26, 2014, and
17
Defendants’ filed their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (#85)
18
on September 5, 2014.
19
The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
20
the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
21
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s
22
Report and Recommendation (#79) entered on July 1, 2014, should be adopted and accepted.
23
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#79) is
ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED,
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#66) is
26
GRANTED.
27
///
28
///
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count III is DISMISSED.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Gedney (#70) is
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to file a Sur-Reply (#78) is
GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Exhibit B Under Seal
(#84) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to
Defendants’ Opposition (#88) is DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment accordingly and close
this case.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
DATED: this 31st day of October, 2014.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?