Bement v. Cox et al

Filing 116

ORDER - The Court vacates its prior order (ECF No. 105 ) and judgment (ECF No. 106 ) in part only with respect to Plaintiff's first two claims under the Rehabilitation Act for disability discrimination and failure to provi de reasonable accommodation. These two claims will now proceed to trial.The parties are directed to file a proposed joint pretrial order within 30 days.Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

BARON BEMENT,

Case No. 3:12-cv-00475-MMD-WGC
Plaintiffs,

7

ORDER

v.
8
JAMES G. COX, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
11

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has resolved Plaintiff’s appeal by affirming in

12

part, reversing in part and remanding for further proceedings. (ECF No. 113.) In particular,

13

the court of appeals affirmed the Court’s granting of summary judgment on Plaintiff’s

14

retaliation claim but reversed the granting of summary judgment on Plaintiff’s disability

15

claims. (Id. at 3-4.) The Court therefore vacates its prior order (ECF No. 105) and judgment

16

(ECF No. 106) in part only with respect to Plaintiff’s first two claims under the Rehabilitation

17

Act for disability discrimination and failure to provide reasonable accommodation. These

18

two claims will now proceed to trial. The parties are directed to file a proposed joint pretrial

19

order within 30 days.

20

DATED THIS 8th day of April 2020.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE