Kinford v. Palmer
ORDER - The Sixth Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 115 ) is granted. Respondents have until June 7, 2021, to answer the surviving claims of the Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 84 ). The Fifth Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 114 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVEN M. KINFORD,
Case No. 3:12-cv-00489-MMD-CLB
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, et al.,
Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that Respondents’ sixth motion for
enlargement of time (ECF No. 115) is granted. Respondents have until June 7, 2021, to
answer the surviving claims of the second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Counsel for Respondents represents that she will prioritize this briefing. Counsel for
Respondents is nonetheless cautioned that further extensions of time will likely not be
granted absent compelling circumstances and a strong showing of good cause why the
answer could not be completed within the extended time allowed despite the exercise of
It is further ordered that Respondents’ fifth motion for enlargement of time (ECF
No. 114) is denied as moot.
DATED THIS 4th Day of June 2021.
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?