Eisele v. INDIAN HILLS GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT et al

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE on 28 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/2/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Rebecca Bruch, Esq. (SBN 7289) Charity Felts, Esq. (SBN 10581) Erickson, Thorpe & Swainston, LTD. 99 West Arroyo Street Reno, NV 89509 (775) 786-3930 (775) 786-4160-Facsimile Attorney for Defendant 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 SANDI EISELE, Case No.: 3:12-cv-00531-MMD-VPC an individual, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 INDIAN HILLS GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a governmental entity, JOHN LUFRANO, an individual, 14 15 16 Defendants. ____________________________/ 17 Plaintiff In Pro Per, SANDI EISELE, and Defendants, INDIAN HILLS GENERAL 18 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT and JOHN LUFRANO by and through their Counsel of Record, 19 Erickson, Thorpe & Swainston, Ltd., and Rebecca Bruch, Esq., hereby stipulate and agree that this 20 21 22 [Remainder of page left intentionally blank.] 23 24 25 26 27 28 Erickson, Thorpe & Swainston, Ltd. P. O. Box 3559 Reno, NV 89505 (775) 786-3930 -1- 1 action should be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its, his or her attorneys fees and 2 costs. 3 DATED this 2nd day of August, 2013. DATED this 2nd day of August, 2013. 4 SANDI EISELE ERICKSON, THORPE & SWAINSTON, LTD. By: /s/ Sandi Eisele SANDI EISELE 984 Dean Drive Gardnerville, Nevada 89460 Pro Se By: /s/ Rebecca Bruch REBECCA BRUCH, ESQ. 99 W. Arroyo Street Reno, Nevada 89509 Attorneys for Defendant 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. August 2, 2013 Dated: _______________________ ________________________________ United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Erickson, Thorpe & Swainston, Ltd. P. O. Box 3559 Reno, NV 89505 (775) 786-3930 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?