Hatlen v. Cox et al
Filing
490
ORDER denying as moot ## 462 , 474 , 481 Motions. Objections ## 481 , 482 are overruled. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
KENNETH HATLEN,
Plaintiff,
10
11
Case No. 3:12-cv-00534-MMD-WGC
v.
ORDER
GREG COX, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
This Order addresses a number of pending motions before this Court.
15
Plaintiff filed two motions for hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary
16
Judgment. (Dkt. nos. 462, 474.) Plaintiff also filed a motion for a status check, requesting
17
the status of his request for a hearing. (Dkt. no. 481.) The Court has set oral argument
18
for September 29, 2015. Plaintiff’s motions (dkt. nos. 462, 474, 481) are denied as
19
moot.
20
Plaintiff filed two objections to the Magistrate Judge’s orders denying two of his
21
motions as moot. (Dkt. nos. 481, 482.) The basis of his objections is that he does not
22
understand the nature of the documents referenced in the Magistrate Judge’s orders
23
docketed as nos. 478 and 480. On June 3, 2015, a minute order was docketed setting a
24
settlement conference for July 21, 2015. (Dkt. no. 476.) However, that order was
25
docketed in error; it should have been docketed in another case. The Court issued a
26
minute order the next day, on June 4, 2015, to correct the error. On June 18, 2015 and
27
June 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed two essentially identical motions to the Court stating his
28
position with respect to settlement. (Dkt. nos. 477, 479.) Because the Court did not order
1
settlement in this case and because the error relating to the minute order setting a
2
settlement conference was corrected, the Magistrate Judge denied Plaintiff’s motions as
3
moot. Plaintiff’s objections (dkt. nos. 481, 482) are overruled.
4
DATED THIS 18th day of September 2015.
5
6
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?