Lozano v. Legeand et al
Filing
7
ORDER Clerk shall file petition and motion for appointment of counsel. Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Clerk shall send petitioner petition for writ of habeas corpus form with instructions (sent 4/26/13). Petitioner shall have 30 days to file amended petition. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
***
8
PASQUAL LOZANO,
9
10
11
12
Case No. 3:12-cv-00574-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
WARDEN LEGEAND, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
Petitioner has paid the filing fee. The Court has reviewed the petition for a writ of
15
habeas corpus pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the
16
United States District Courts. Petitioner will need to file an amended petition.
17
Petitioner was convicted in state court of murder with the use of a weapon and
18
attempted murder with the use of a weapon. Petitioner appealed, and the Nevada
19
Supreme Court affirmed on July 28, 2008.
20
pursued post-conviction relief in the state courts.
Petitioner has not stated whether he
21
Each of petitioners grounds states, “Whatever my lawyer put.” These statements
22
do not show that petitioner is in custody in violation of the constitution or the laws of the
23
United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Petitioner has submitted his post-conviction-
24
appeal briefs as an exhibit (dkt. no. 5), but the Court will not construct a federal habeas
25
corpus petition for him out of those briefs. Additionally, the Court does not possess
26
copies of petitioner’s direct-appeal briefs, and petitioner might want to present to this
27
Court the issues that he raised on direct appeal.
28
creating a federal habeas corpus petition from his direct-appeal and post-conviction-
Petitioner should be capable of
1
appeal briefs, even if petitioner simply copies the grounds he raised in state court onto
2
the federal habeas corpus petition form.
3
Petitioner has submitted a motion for appointment of counsel. Whenever the
4
Court determines that the interests of justice so require, counsel may be appointed to
5
any financially eligible person who is seeking habeas corpus relief. 18 U.S.C.
6
§ 3006A(a)(2)(B). “[T]he district court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the
7
merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the
8
complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952 (9th Cir.
9
1983). There is no constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas proceedings.
10
McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991). The factors to consider are not separate
11
from the underlying claims, but are intrinsically enmeshed with them. Weygandt, 718
12
F.2d at 954. At the moment, the Court cannot evaluate the likelihood of success on the
13
merits, the complexity of the issues, and petitioner’s ability to articulate those issues
14
because petitioner has not presented any grounds for relief to the Court. The Court
15
denies petitioner’s motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court file the petition for a
16
17
writ of habeas corpus and the motion for appointment of counsel.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is
18
19
DENIED.
20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send petitioner a
21
petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 form with instructions.
22
Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered in which to
23
file an amended petition to correct the noted deficiencies. Failure to comply with this
24
order will result in the dismissal of this action.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall clearly title the amended petition
2
as such by placing the word “AMENDED” immediately above “Petition for a Writ of
3
Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254” on page 1 in the caption, and petitioner
4
shall place the docket number, 3:12-cv-00574-MMD-VPC, above the word “AMENDED.”
5
6
DATED THIS 26th day of April 2013.
7
8
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?