Cottle v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 8/30/2013, denying 35 motion for order staying discovery. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SEAN DAVID COTTLE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants
)
________________________________________ )
3:12-cv-00645-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
August 30, 2013
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff’s “Motion Submission of Pleading and LR 26-4 Motion for
Amended Complaint/Renew Injunction.” (Doc. # 35.) Plaintiff’s motion seeks an order of the court
“to stay discovery or extend it so my amended complaint with renewed injunction can be answered
first before a scheduling order is ordered.” (Id at 1-2.) However, on August 27, 2013, District Judge
Miranda M. Du denied Plaintiff’s motions to amend (Doc. ## 19, 20, 21). (Doc. #34.)
Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. # 35) for an order staying discovery is therefore DENIED. Plaintiff
is advised his “Motion to Renew Preliminary/TRO Injunction” will be addressed in the Court’s
normal course.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?