Cottle v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al

Filing 36

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 8/30/2013, denying 35 motion for order staying discovery. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SEAN DAVID COTTLE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ) et al., ) ) Defendants ) ________________________________________ ) 3:12-cv-00645-MMD-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT August 30, 2013 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is Plaintiff’s “Motion Submission of Pleading and LR 26-4 Motion for Amended Complaint/Renew Injunction.” (Doc. # 35.) Plaintiff’s motion seeks an order of the court “to stay discovery or extend it so my amended complaint with renewed injunction can be answered first before a scheduling order is ordered.” (Id at 1-2.) However, on August 27, 2013, District Judge Miranda M. Du denied Plaintiff’s motions to amend (Doc. ## 19, 20, 21). (Doc. #34.) Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. # 35) for an order staying discovery is therefore DENIED. Plaintiff is advised his “Motion to Renew Preliminary/TRO Injunction” will be addressed in the Court’s normal course. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?