Breck v. Roger Doyle et al

Filing 201

ORDER that the Individual Defendants will have 30 days from the date of entry of this order to respond to the operative complaint (ECF No. 124 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 WILLIAM BRECK, Case No. 3:12-cv-00649-MMD-CLB Plaintiff, 7 v. ORDER 8 ROGER DOYLE, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 This case arises from a state attorney-discipline matter. The Court previously 12 issued an order granting two motions to dismiss, and pro se Plaintiff William Breck 13 appealed. (ECF Nos. 185 (“Order”), 191 (notice of appeal).) The Ninth Circuit Court of 14 Appeals affirmed the Order in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further 15 proceedings consistent with its decision. (ECF No. 197.) In particular, the court of 16 appeals reversed this Court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against the Individual 17 Defendants1 (nine individuals who participated in his disciplinary proceedings) for 18 damages unrelated to the State Bar of Nevada’s disciplinary order. (Id. at 4-6.) The court 19 of appeals found that this Court committed error in applying state law immunity to claims 20 against these Defendants, though it noted that federally-recognized common-law 21 immunities may apply. (Id. at 5-6.) Accordingly, the Court’s Order (ECF No. 185) and 22 Judgment (ECF No. 186) are vacated as they relate to the Individual Defendants. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 1David Clark, Kimberly Farmer, Laura Peters, Patrick King, J. Thomas Susich, Caren Cafferata-Jenkins, and Kathleen Breckenridge, collectively, the “Individual Defendants.” (ECF No. 130 at 1.) 1 2 3 It is therefore ordered that the Individual Defendants will have 30 days from the date of entry of this order to respond to the operative complaint (ECF No. 124). DATED THIS 16th day of December 2019. 4 5 6 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?