Breck v. Roger Doyle et al
Filing
201
ORDER that the Individual Defendants will have 30 days from the date of entry of this order to respond to the operative complaint (ECF No. 124 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
WILLIAM BRECK,
Case No. 3:12-cv-00649-MMD-CLB
Plaintiff,
7
v.
ORDER
8
ROGER DOYLE, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
11
This case arises from a state attorney-discipline matter. The Court previously
12
issued an order granting two motions to dismiss, and pro se Plaintiff William Breck
13
appealed. (ECF Nos. 185 (“Order”), 191 (notice of appeal).) The Ninth Circuit Court of
14
Appeals affirmed the Order in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further
15
proceedings consistent with its decision. (ECF No. 197.) In particular, the court of
16
appeals reversed this Court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against the Individual
17
Defendants1 (nine individuals who participated in his disciplinary proceedings) for
18
damages unrelated to the State Bar of Nevada’s disciplinary order. (Id. at 4-6.) The court
19
of appeals found that this Court committed error in applying state law immunity to claims
20
against these Defendants, though it noted that federally-recognized common-law
21
immunities may apply. (Id. at 5-6.) Accordingly, the Court’s Order (ECF No. 185) and
22
Judgment (ECF No. 186) are vacated as they relate to the Individual Defendants.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
27
28
1David
Clark, Kimberly Farmer, Laura Peters, Patrick King, J. Thomas Susich,
Caren Cafferata-Jenkins, and Kathleen Breckenridge, collectively, the “Individual
Defendants.” (ECF No. 130 at 1.)
1
2
3
It is therefore ordered that the Individual Defendants will have 30 days from the
date of entry of this order to respond to the operative complaint (ECF No. 124).
DATED THIS 16th day of December 2019.
4
5
6
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?