Humboldt County, et al v. Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 34

ORDER denying as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 11 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 HUMBOLDT COUNTY et al., 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 12 This is a declaratory judgment action concerning rights of way over federal land pursuant 7 Plaintiffs, 8 vs. 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., 10 Defendants. 3:12-cv-00650-RCJ-WGC ORDER 13 to the Mining Act of July 26, 1866. Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint, but Plaintiffs 14 have filed an Amended Complaint (“AC”), which Defendants have answered. The Court 15 therefore denies the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) as moot, (see Mins. 2 n.1, Aug. 7, 2013, 16 ECF No. 19 (“[A r]esponse to [the] Motion to Dismiss deadline will become moot if the 17 Government files an Answer to the anticipated Amended Complaint.”)), and grants the Motion 18 for Leave to File Excess Pages (ECF No. 11) as to a prospective motion against the AC. 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 1 CONCLUSION 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) is DENIED as moot. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (ECF No. 4 5 6 11) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 26th day of November, 2013. Dated this 18th day of November, 2013. 7 8 9 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?