Veris Gold USA Inc. v. Heyl & Patterson, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER denying as moot 13 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 2/25/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

VERIS GOLD USA INC.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HEYL & PATTERSON, INC., and DOES )
1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )

3:13-cv-00009-HDM-VPC
ORDER

On January 25, 2013, defendant filed a motion to dismiss

16

plaintiff’s claim for consequential damages (#13).

17

2013, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint removing from the

18

body of the complaint the language that related to consequential

19

damages.

20

original complaint.

21

States, - F.3d -, 2013 WL 501648 (9th Cir. Feb. 12, 2013).

22

Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss (#13) is DENIED AS MOOT.

On February 5,

Plaintiff’s amended complaint supersedes plaintiff’s
Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. United

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

DATED: This 25th day of February, 2013.

25
26

____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1