Taylor et al v. Myles et al

Filing 42

ORDER re 1 Petition, 40 Answer: Petitioner's reply due within 30 days. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court is highly unlikely to grant further extensions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

***

10

MICHELLE TAYLOR,

11
12
13

Case No. 3:13-cv-00035-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
CAROLYN MYLES, et al.,
Respondents.

14
15
16

On July 7, 2015, respondents answered this petition for writ of habeas corpus.

17

(Dkt. no. 40.) It appears that counsel for petitioner contacted the Clerk of Court and

18

stated that a major computer malfunction prevented him from timely filing a reply.

19

Counsel for petitioner has not filed a motion for extension of time. However, the Court

20

will grant petitioner a thirty (30) day extension of time to file a reply, if any, to the

21

answer. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court is highly unlikely to grant further

22

extensions.

23
24
25

It is therefore ordered that petitioner shall file a reply to the answer within thirty
(30) days of the date of entry of this order.
DATED THIS 30th day of September 2015.

26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE