Hernandez v. Baker et al
Filing
169
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 1/5/2016, granting in part and denying in part 166 and 167 Motions. Component of 166 motion which seeks extension of time to file objections is denied as moot. Request for copy work extension in amount of $10.00 is granted (copy of order mailed to NDOC). Request for copy of objections is granted (copy of 168 objections mailed to plaintiff). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
INGINIO HERNANDEZ,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
)
)
Defendants
)
________________________________________)
3:13-cv-00083-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
January 5, 2016
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court are two motions filed by Plaintiff: ECF No. 166, filed on December 30,
2015, and ECF No. 167, filed on January 4, 2016. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s motions
are granted in part and denied in part.
ECF No. 166
As best as the court can discern, ECF No. 166 seeks a fourth extension of time to file
Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation. Hidden within the motion is a request for
an extension of Plaintiff’s copy work limit in the amount of Ten Dollar ($10.00). Plaintiff states
he needs the copy work extension so that he can “be able to maken the copy to [serve]” a copy of his
objections on the Defendants. (Id. at 3.)
The record reflects that on December 29, 2015, District Judge Du granted Plaintiff’s motions
for extension of time (ECF Nos. 159 and 163) nunc pro tunc (ECF No. 165) and that on January 4,
2016, Plaintiff filed his objections (ECF No. 168).
Therefore, the component of Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 166) which seeks fourth extension
of time to file his objections is denied as moot; however, Plaintiff’s request for a copy work
extension in the amount of $10.00 is granted.
MINUTES OF THE COURT
3:13-cv-00083-MMD-WGC
Date: January 5, 2016
Page 2
ECF No. 167
In this motion, Plaintiff requests a fourth extension of his copy work allowance in the amount
of Fifteen Dollars $15.00 to serve Defendants with his motion.” The motion Plaintiff refers to is his
90 page objections to the court’s report and recommendation which, as noted above, was filed on
January 4, 2016, (ECF No. 168). Plaintiff also requests that the court return his objections so that
he can make copies to serve the Defendants. (ECF No. 167 at 2.)
Insofar as Plaintiff seeks another extension of his copy work limit, his motion (ECF No. 167)
is denied. However, the court grants Plaintiff’s request for a copy of his objections.
The Clerk of the court shall send to Plaintiff a copy of his objections (ECF No. 168).
The Clerk shall send a copy of this order extending copy work to the Chief of Inmate
Services for NDOC (P.O. Box 7011 Carson City, NV 89702) so that the funds can be properly
allocated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?