Titus v. LeGrand et al
Filing
6
ORDER: Clerk shall file and electronically serve the 1 Petition on the respondents (service completed 6/18/13). Respondents shall have 45 days to answer, or otherwise respond to, petition. Petitioner's 1 -11 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. Any state court record exhibits filed by Respondents shall be filed with separate index. Hard copy of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to staff attorneys in Reno. Henceforth, Petitioner to serve upon th e NV AG a copy of every pleading, motion, or document submitted for consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with original paper submitted for filing a certificate of mailing. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 06/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
CRAIG M. TITUS,
Petitioner,
10
11
12
Case No. 3:13-cv-00106-MMD-WGC
ORDER
v.
ROBERT LeGRAND, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
15
This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28
16
U.S.C. § 2254, by a Nevada state prisoner. Previously, this Court denied petitioner’s
17
motion to proceed in forma pauperis and required petitioner to pay the filing fee for this
18
action. (Dkt. no. 3.) Petitioner has now paid the filing fee for this action. (Dkt. no. 4.)
19
Petitioner has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. (Dkt. no. 1-11.)
20
There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus
21
proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999
22
F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). The decision to appoint counsel is generally
23
discretionary. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481
24
U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469
25
U.S. 838 (1984). The petition on file in this action is well-written and sufficiently clear in
26
presenting the issues that petitioner wishes to bring. The issues in this case are not
27
complex. It does not appear that counsel is justified in this instance. The motion shall
28
be denied.
1
The petition shall now be filed and served on respondents. A petition for federal
2
habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of which petitioner is aware. If
3
petitioner fails to include such a claim in his petition, he may be forever barred from
4
seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b) (successive
5
petitions).
6
7
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall file and electronically serve
the petition (dkt. no. 1) upon the respondents.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from
9
entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. In their
10
answer or other response, respondents shall address all claims presented in the
11
petition. Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial
12
responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive
13
motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed, respondents shall
14
comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the
15
United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. If an answer is filed, petitioner
16
shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply.
17
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for the appointment of
counsel (dkt. no. 1-11) is DENIED.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by
20
respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by
21
number or letter. The hard copy of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for
22
this case, to the staff attorneys in the Reno Division of the Court.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon the
24
Attorney General of the State of Nevada a copy of every pleading, motion, or other
25
document he submits for consideration by the Court. Petitioner shall include with the
26
original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct
27
copy of the document was mailed to the Attorney General. The Court may disregard
28
any paper that does not include a certificate of service. After respondents appear in this
2
1
action, petitioner shall make such service upon the particular Deputy Attorney General
2
assigned to the case.
3
DATED THIS 18th day of June 2013.
4
5
6
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?