Anthony et al v. Mayopoulos et al

Filing 12

ORDERED that Plaintiffs Patricia Louise Anthony and William Michael Anthony have twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failing to pay the required filing fee. Failure to respond to this Order will result in a dismissal of their claim with prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/3/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 PATRICIA LOUISE ANTHONY and WILLIAM MICHAEL ANTHONY, Case No. 3:13-cv-00147-MMD-WGC 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 TIMOTHY MAYOPOULOS, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On March 22, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a “Declaration of Wrongs.” (See dkt. no. 2.) 16 The Court issued an order on April 8, 2013, informing Plaintiffs that the filing fee for 17 proceeding in federal court had not been filed. (See dkt. no. 8.) The Court noted that 18 Plaintiffs may proceed with their filings if they pay the appropriate filing fee or submit an 19 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court provided Plaintiffs with twenty (20) 20 days to comply. 21 As of May 3, 2013, Plaintiffs have not filed the Application, nor have they paid the 22 appropriate filing fee. Instead, Plaintiffs filed a “Writ of Error and Corrections” refusing to 23 comply with the Court’s April 8 Order. (See dkt. no. 11.) Plaintiffs mischaracterize the 24 filing fee requirement as an imposition of a debt upon Plaintiffs by the Court. Contrary to 25 Plaintiffs’ statements, federal courts have routinely held that “reasonable costs may be 26 imposed on persons who want to sue.” Lumbert v. Illinois Dep’t of Corrections, 827 F.2d 27 257, 259 (7th Cir.1987). For those individuals who cannot pay the reasonable court 28 costs associated with bringing a suit, the in forma pauperis mechanism exists to waive 1 filing fees should a litigant not have the means to pay for their costs of bringing litigation. 2 Proceeding in forma pauperis simply means that a plaintiff is allowed to bring a suit 3 without paying a filing fee; it does not alter their rights under the law, or impact the merits 4 of their claims. In the absence of meeting the in forma pauperis process, any litigant 5 seeking to bring a suit in federal court must pay a filing fee. 6 Accordingly, Plaintiffs are required either to pay their filing fee or to submit their in 7 forma pauperis application for review. As they have failed to do either, they will be 8 required to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed. 9 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs Patricia Louise Anthony and William 10 Michael Anthony have twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order to show cause 11 as to why this case should not be dismissed for failing to pay the required filing fee. 12 Failure to respond to this Order will result in a dismissal of their claim with prejudice. 13 DATED THIS 3rd day of May 2013. 14 15 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?