Howard v. Baker et al

Filing 48

ORDER DENYING # 30 Motion for reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 11/20/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SAMUEL HOWARD, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RENEE BAKER, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) PRESENT: 3:13-cv-00163-MMD-VPC MINUTES OF THE COURT November 20, 2014 THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (#30) of the court’s order denying appointment of counsel (#26), and defendants’ response thereto (#32). Plaintiff did not file a reply. Having reviewed the papers, the court DENIES plaintiff’s motion. This court may reconsider a prior order. See Henry v. Rizzolo, No. 2:08-cv-00635-PMPGWF, 2010 WL 3636278, at *1 (D. Nev. Sept. 10, 2010); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a). However, a motion for reconsideration is proper only where the moving party sets forth “some valid reason why the court should revisit its prior order” and also “facts or law of a ‘strongly convincing nature’ in support of reversing the prior decision.” Henry, 2010 WL 3636278, at *1 (quoting Frasure v. United States, 256 F. Supp. 2d 1180, 1183 (D. Nev. 2003)). Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration does not meet this burden. It contains only plaintiff’s affidavit and related exhibits, which establish he is legally blind and struggles to complete tasks related to this litigation, and also plaintiff’s reiteration that he lacks law clerk assistance because he is held in isolation. Plaintiff provided this information to the court in his original motion (#22). The court fully considered it at that time. The court therefore DENIES the motion. It fails to articulate a valid reason for revisiting the prior order, and also lacks any argument in support of reversal. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?