Avendano et al v. Security Consultants Group, Inc. et al

Filing 239

ORDER directing defendants to file a response to 238 Motion to Seal, no later than October 21, 2015, that sets out compelling reasons justifying the sealing of exhibits. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ISSAC AVENDANO and ROLANDO DUENAS, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) vs. ) ) SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) 3:13-cv-00168-HDM-VPC ORDER 19 On October 14, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to seal exhibits 20 to their responses in opposition to the motions for summary judgment 21 (#238). 22 30, 31, and 45 is that they were “designated as confidential by either 23 the Union (Ex. 45) or Corporate Defendants (Exs. 30-31).” #238 at 3. 24 Defendants shall have until October 21, 2015, to file a response 25 to plaintiffs’ motion to seal that sets out the compelling reasons 26 justifying the sealing of the exhibits, as well as whether the 27 exhibits can be redacted as opposed to sealed in their entirety. 28 exhibits will remain sealed at this time. The sole reason plaintiffs provided for sealing Exhibit Nos. 1 The Failure to file a response 1 no later than October 21, 2015, may result in an order unsealing the 2 exhibits. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: This 15th day of October, 2015. 5 6 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?