Avendano et al v. Security Consultants Group, Inc. et al
Filing
239
ORDER directing defendants to file a response to 238 Motion to Seal, no later than October 21, 2015, that sets out compelling reasons justifying the sealing of exhibits. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ISSAC AVENDANO and ROLANDO
DUENAS,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INC., )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
3:13-cv-00168-HDM-VPC
ORDER
19
On October 14, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to seal exhibits
20
to their responses in opposition to the motions for summary judgment
21
(#238).
22
30, 31, and 45 is that they were “designated as confidential by either
23
the Union (Ex. 45) or Corporate Defendants (Exs. 30-31).” #238 at 3.
24
Defendants shall have until October 21, 2015, to file a response
25
to plaintiffs’ motion to seal that sets out the compelling reasons
26
justifying the sealing of the exhibits, as well as whether the
27
exhibits can be redacted as opposed to sealed in their entirety.
28
exhibits will remain sealed at this time.
The sole reason plaintiffs provided for sealing Exhibit Nos.
1
The
Failure to file a response
1
no later than October 21, 2015, may result in an order unsealing the
2
exhibits.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: This 15th day of October, 2015.
5
6
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?