Avendano et al v. Security Consultants Group, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER Court stays order 52 entered 1/28/2014 so that Ds may have an opportunity to file their objections to the Ps motion to file documents under seal 49 . Ds response to 49 due by 2/7/2014. Should Ps wish to file a reply it is due by 2/17/20 14. In light of this order, the time for Ps to file their response to the D's motion to disqualify 47 shall be extended 10 days after the court issues a final ruling on the Ps motion to file documents under seal 49 . Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - WJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ISAAC AVENDANO and ROLAND DUENAS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) 3:13-cv-00168-HDM-VPC ORDER The court stays its order (#52) entered January 28, 2014 so 14 that the defendants may have an opportunity to file their 15 objections to the plaintiffs’ motion to file documents under seal 16 (#49). 17 under seal shall be filed on or before February 7, 2014. 18 the plaintiffs wish to file a reply, they shall do so on or before 19 February 17, 2014. 20 The defendants’ response to the motion to file documents Should In light of this order, the time for plaintiffs to file their 21 response to the defendants’ motion to disqualify (#47) shall be 22 extended until ten days after the court issues a final ruling on 23 the plaintiffs’ motion to file documents under seal. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: This 28th day of January, 2014. 26 27 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?