Divald v. Salay et al

Filing 20

ORDER re 19 Letter/application for status check as to the disposition of motions pending. The motions referenced herein do not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending motions in civil cases. Oral argument will be scheduled if the Court determines argument is necessary. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 MARY ANNE DIVALD, individually Case No. 3:13-cv-00199-MMD-VPC Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER 11 JAMES K. SALAY, individually, 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 Before the Court is plaintiff’s application, pursuant to Local Rule 7-6(b), for a Plaintiff’s 16 status check as to the disposition of motions pending. (Dkt. no. 19.) 17 Application for Default Judgment (dkt. no. 14) was filed on June 13, 2013, and was ripe 18 and fully submitted to the Court on June 14, 2013. Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside 19 Default (dkt. no. 15) was filed on June 25, 2013, and was ripe and fully submitted to the 20 Court on July 26, 2013. The Court disposes of pending civil motions in chronological 21 order, except for those motions that require disposition on an expedited basis. There are 22 numerous cases with ripe motions filed before the motions pending in this case. The 23 motions here do not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will 24 therefore be decided in the order of pending motions in civil cases. Oral argument will 25 be scheduled if the Court determines argument is necessary. 26 DATED THIS 25th day of October 2013. 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?