Smith v. Homes et al
Filing
59
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 6/25/2014, denying Defendants' 58 Motion to Strike. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
WILLIE SMITH,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HOMES, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
3:13-cv-00202-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
June 25, 2014
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Defendants' Motion to Strike wherein Defendants seek an order of court
striking Plaintiff's sur-reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#54]. (Doc. # 58 at 1.) However, as
reflected in the June 19, 2014 Report and Recommendation to District Judge Miranda M. Du, the
court has already considered Plaintiff's June 10, 2014 response to Defendants' reply:
In his response to Defendants' reply (which Defendants have not moved to
strike), Plaintiff argues that the release provision Defendants contend bars this
action was not one of the terms the parties agreed to that was recited on the
record in 3:12-cv-00024-LRH-VPC. (Doc. # 54.) While the Local Rules of
Practice only permit the filing of a motion, response and reply, the court will
afford Plaintiff, a pro se inmate litigant, with some latitude and will consider his
response to Defendants' reply since the subject motion is potentially
case-dispositive.
(Doc. # 57 at 3-4.)
Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. # 58) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?