McDonald v. Olivas et al

Filing 13

ORDERED that # 12 Motion for an extension of the mediation stay is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the stay in this action is extended until February 27, 2014. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants SHALL FILE the status report, in compliance with the screening order, not later than February 27, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 REGINALD MCDONALD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 OLIVAS, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / Case No. 3:13-cv-00240-MMD-WGC ORDER 16 17 This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a state 18 prisoner. This Court entered a screening order on October 22, 2013. (ECF No. 5). The screening 19 order imposed a 90-day stay to allow the parties to engage in settlement discussions. (Id.). At the 20 end of the 90-day stay, counsel for defendants were directed to file a status report. (Id.). The 90-day 21 stay expires on January 20, 2014. (Id.). 22 Defendants have moved to extend the stay for the purpose of conducting a mediation 23 conference with plaintiff on February 25, 2014. (ECF No. 12). Defendants request that the stay be 24 extended until February 27, 2014. Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion is granted. 25 26 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ motion for an extension of the mediation stay (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay in this action is extended until February 27, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants SHALL FILE the status report, in compliance with the screening order, not later than February 27, 2014. Dated this 18th day of December, 2013. 6 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?