McDonald v. Olivas et al

Filing 174

ORDER - The Office of the Attorney General, within 5 business days of this Order, is directed to file a Notice to the Court advising the Court whether the Office of the Attorney General has a current address for Plaintiff beyond the CCDC. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/4/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 REGINALD McDONALD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) OLIVAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________) 3:13-cv-00240-MMD-WGC ORDER Re: ECF No. 172, Referral of ECF No. 169 Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider 12 13 On this date, District Judge Miranda M Du referred Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order 14 (ECF No. 169) to the undersigned for disposition. (ECF No. 172.) At the direction of the Court, the 15 Court Clerk contacted the Clark County Detention Center (CCDC) to discuss the logistics for scheduling 16 a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion. The Court Clerk was advised by the CCDC that Mr. McDonald was 17 released from custody in January 2016 and that the CCDC had no forwarding or current address for 18 Plaintiff. 19 In an attempt to ascertain, if possible, Mr. McDonald’s whereabouts, the Office of the Attorney 20 General, within five (5) business days of this Order, is directed to file a Notice to the Court advising the 21 Court whether the Office of the Attorney General has a current address for Plaintiff beyond the CCDC. 22 Plaintiff is also reminded of his obligation under Local Special Rule 2-2 to keep the court advised 23 of his current address. Again, the failure of Plaintiff to do so may result in the Court summarily denying 24 Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration or other sanctions as appropriate. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: May 4, 2016. 27 28 _____________________________________ WILLIAM G. COBB UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?