McDonald v. Olivas et al
Filing
174
ORDER - The Office of the Attorney General, within 5 business days of this Order, is directed to file a Notice to the Court advising the Court whether the Office of the Attorney General has a current address for Plaintiff beyond the CCDC. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/4/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
REGINALD McDONALD,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
OLIVAS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________________)
3:13-cv-00240-MMD-WGC
ORDER
Re: ECF No. 172,
Referral of ECF No. 169
Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider
12
13
On this date, District Judge Miranda M Du referred Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order
14
(ECF No. 169) to the undersigned for disposition. (ECF No. 172.) At the direction of the Court, the
15
Court Clerk contacted the Clark County Detention Center (CCDC) to discuss the logistics for scheduling
16
a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion. The Court Clerk was advised by the CCDC that Mr. McDonald was
17
released from custody in January 2016 and that the CCDC had no forwarding or current address for
18
Plaintiff.
19
In an attempt to ascertain, if possible, Mr. McDonald’s whereabouts, the Office of the Attorney
20
General, within five (5) business days of this Order, is directed to file a Notice to the Court advising the
21
Court whether the Office of the Attorney General has a current address for Plaintiff beyond the CCDC.
22
Plaintiff is also reminded of his obligation under Local Special Rule 2-2 to keep the court advised
23
of his current address. Again, the failure of Plaintiff to do so may result in the Court summarily denying
24
Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration or other sanctions as appropriate.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: May 4, 2016.
27
28
_____________________________________
WILLIAM G. COBB
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?