Smith v. Baker et al
Filing
88
ORDERED that the unopposed motion to extend time (ECF No. 87 ) is GRANTED. Answer to ECF No. 44 Second Amended Petition due by 10/5/2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to extend time (ECF No. 86 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
Allison Herr (NV Bar No 5383)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 486-3799 (phone)
(702) 486-2377 (fax)
AHerr@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Respondents
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
MICHAEL SMITH,
11
Case No. 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC
Petitioner,
12
vs.
13
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
14
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO ANSWER THE SECOND
AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 44)
Respondents.
(THIRD REQUEST)
15
16
Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of thirty days from the current due date
17
of Friday, September 4, 2020 up to and including Monday, October 5, 2020, in which to file their answer
18
to Petitioner Michael Smith’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ECF No. 44. This
19
motion is made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based
20
upon the attached affidavit of counsel.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
This is the third enlargement of time sought by Respondents and is brought in good faith and not
for the purpose of delay.
DATED September 4, 2020.
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By: /s/ Allison Herr
ALLISON HERR (Bar No. 5383)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
28
Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
DECLARATION OF ALLISON HERR
STATE OF NEVADA
)
) ss:
COUNTY OF CLARK )
4
I, Allison Herr, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows:
5
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada and am
6
employed as a Senior Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I have
7
been assigned to represent Respondents in the case of Smith v. Baker, 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC, and as
8
such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein.
9
2.
An answer to the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 44) is
10
currently due on Friday, September 4, 2020. Respondents have been unable to timely complete their
11
answer and need additional time. Respondents seek an extension of thirty days up to and including
12
Monday, October 5, 2020.
13
3.
Respondents understand that this is an older case that needs to be prioritized and that it is
14
unusual for this Court to grant another extension without good cause. However, I had a family member
15
who became ill with Covid-19. Due to my exposure to him, I was also under quarantine and unable to go
16
into the office to review some of the necessary exhibits in this matter. His care, which included emergency
17
room visits, and an extended hospital stay, as well as testing protocols for myself and other family
18
members took me away from work for several days during the month of August. This had a ripple effect,
19
as matters due during that period got pushed back. The last of those items, a Ninth Circuit answering
20
brief in Minor v. Williams, Case No. 19-15822 due on August 17, 2020 was pushed to September 2, 2020.
21
Unfortunately, that left insufficient time to complete the answer in this matter by September 4, 2020.
22
Consequently, Respondents are seeking an additional extension of thirty days to complete the answer.
23
24
4.
Respondents have conferred with counsel for Petitioner about this request and Petitioner’s
counsel does not object to the requested extension.
25
5.
This is the third request for an extension.
26
6.
This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
27
...
28
...
Page 2 of 4
1
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
2
Executed on this 4th day of September 2020.
3
4
/s/ Allison Herr
ALLISON HERR (Bar No. 5383)
5
6
7
8
9
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion to extend time (ECF No. 87) is
GRANTED.
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to extend time (ECF 86) is DENIED as MOOT.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated: This 22nd day of September, 2020.
13
14
15
16
17
_______________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?