Smith v. Baker et al
Filing
90
ORDER granting ECF No. 89 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents shall file and answer to the Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 44 ) on or before Wednesday, November 4, 2020. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
Allison Herr (NV Bar No 5383)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 486-3799 (phone)
(702) 486-2377 (fax)
AHerr@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Respondents
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
MICHAEL L. SMITH,
Case No. 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC
11
Petitioner,
12
vs.
13
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
14
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
ANSWER TO AMENDED PETITION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
(ECF NO. 44)
Respondents.
(FOURTH REQUEST)
15
16
Respondents move this Court for a thirty-day extension of time from the current due date of
17
Monday, October 5, 2020 up to and including Wednesday, November 4, 2020 in which to file their answer
18
to Michael Smith’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ECF No. 44. This motion is
19
made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based upon the
20
attached affidavit of counsel.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
This is the fourth enlargement of time sought by Respondents and is brought in good faith and
not for the purpose of delay.
DATED October 5, 2020.
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By: /s/ Allison Herr
ALLISON HERR (Bar No. 5383)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
28
Page 1 of 4
Case 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC Document 89 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 4
1
2
3
DECLARATION OF ALLISON HERR
STATE OF NEVADA
)
) ss:
COUNTY OF CLARK )
4
I, Allison Herr, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows:
5
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada and am
6
employed as a Senior Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I have
7
been assigned to represent Respondents in the case of Smith v. Baker, 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC, and as
8
such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein.
9
2.
An answer to the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 44) is
10
currently due on Monday, October 5, 2020. I have been unable to timely complete the answer in this
11
matter and need additional time to respond. I am seeking an extension of thirty days up to and including
12
Wednesday, November 4, 2020.
13
3.
I recognize that it is highly unusual to seek or to be granted a fourth extension. However,
14
I had encountered several emergency matters, both professional and personal that subverted my efforts
15
to complete this project. When I previously sought a third extension, I advised this Court that my husband
16
had been ill with covid. At the time that motion was drafted, I believed he was recovering so only sought
17
a thirty-day extension. However, after seeking this extension he experienced another setback and was
18
again hospitalized. In addition, I am working from home and subject to remote access to work computers.
19
In an effort to improve reliability, the Office of the Nevada Attorney General is transitioning databases
20
to cloud services, and while this will be an improvement in the long run, in the short run this has resulted
21
in computer outages on September 8, 2020; September 11, 2020; September 14, 2020; September 15,
22
2020; and September 18, 2020, frustrating my ability to access necessary information to respond to this
23
matter. Further due to an electronic filing error, on September 21, 2020, I learned for the first time of a
24
9th Circuit matter filed under case 20-72428. The better part of a day was spent identifying the error and
25
remedying the situation. While the Ninth Circuit Court did grant me a brief extension, that extension was
26
only granted to October 5, 2020 to file my opposing pleadings. Unfortunately, all of these matters
27
negatively impacted my ability to complete the answer in this matter. Thus, I am seeking another
28
extension based upon the totality of the circumstances.
Page 2 of 4
Case 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC Document 89 Filed 10/05/20 Page 3 of 4
1
5.
I have discussed this matter with opposing counsel, and she does not oppose my request.
2
6.
This is the fourth request for an extension to file the answer.
3
7.
This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
4
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
5
Executed on this 5th day of October 2020.
6
7
/s/ Allison Herr
ALLISON HERR (Bar No. 5383)
8
9
10
11
12
13
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Amended
Petition for Writ of habeas Corpus (ECF No. 89) is GRANTED.
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file and answer to the Second Amended Petition
for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 44) on or before Wednesday, November 4, 2020.
15
21st
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of October, 2020.
16
17
18
19
__________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 4
Case 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC Document 89 Filed 10/05/20 Page 4 of 4
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to File
3
Answer to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fourth Request) with the Clerk of the
4
Court by using the CM/ECF system on October 5, 2020.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
The following participants in this case are registered electronic filing system users and will be
served electronically:
Amelia L. Bizzaro
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Wisconsin State Bar No. 1045709
411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
Amelia_Bizzaro@fd.org
/s/
C. Martinez
An employee of the Office of the Attorney General
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?