Smith v. Baker et al

Filing 90

ORDER granting ECF No. 89 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents shall file and answer to the Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 44 ) on or before Wednesday, November 4, 2020. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AARON D. FORD Attorney General Allison Herr (NV Bar No 5383) Senior Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 486-3799 (phone) (702) 486-2377 (fax) AHerr@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Respondents 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 MICHAEL L. SMITH, Case No. 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 RENEE BAKER, et al., 14 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 44) Respondents. (FOURTH REQUEST) 15 16 Respondents move this Court for a thirty-day extension of time from the current due date of 17 Monday, October 5, 2020 up to and including Wednesday, November 4, 2020 in which to file their answer 18 to Michael Smith’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ECF No. 44. This motion is 19 made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based upon the 20 attached affidavit of counsel. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 This is the fourth enlargement of time sought by Respondents and is brought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. DATED October 5, 2020. AARON D. FORD Attorney General By: /s/ Allison Herr ALLISON HERR (Bar No. 5383) Senior Deputy Attorney General 28 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC Document 89 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 DECLARATION OF ALLISON HERR STATE OF NEVADA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF CLARK ) 4 I, Allison Herr, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows: 5 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada and am 6 employed as a Senior Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I have 7 been assigned to represent Respondents in the case of Smith v. Baker, 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC, and as 8 such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein. 9 2. An answer to the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 44) is 10 currently due on Monday, October 5, 2020. I have been unable to timely complete the answer in this 11 matter and need additional time to respond. I am seeking an extension of thirty days up to and including 12 Wednesday, November 4, 2020. 13 3. I recognize that it is highly unusual to seek or to be granted a fourth extension. However, 14 I had encountered several emergency matters, both professional and personal that subverted my efforts 15 to complete this project. When I previously sought a third extension, I advised this Court that my husband 16 had been ill with covid. At the time that motion was drafted, I believed he was recovering so only sought 17 a thirty-day extension. However, after seeking this extension he experienced another setback and was 18 again hospitalized. In addition, I am working from home and subject to remote access to work computers. 19 In an effort to improve reliability, the Office of the Nevada Attorney General is transitioning databases 20 to cloud services, and while this will be an improvement in the long run, in the short run this has resulted 21 in computer outages on September 8, 2020; September 11, 2020; September 14, 2020; September 15, 22 2020; and September 18, 2020, frustrating my ability to access necessary information to respond to this 23 matter. Further due to an electronic filing error, on September 21, 2020, I learned for the first time of a 24 9th Circuit matter filed under case 20-72428. The better part of a day was spent identifying the error and 25 remedying the situation. While the Ninth Circuit Court did grant me a brief extension, that extension was 26 only granted to October 5, 2020 to file my opposing pleadings. Unfortunately, all of these matters 27 negatively impacted my ability to complete the answer in this matter. Thus, I am seeking another 28 extension based upon the totality of the circumstances. Page 2 of 4 Case 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC Document 89 Filed 10/05/20 Page 3 of 4 1 5. I have discussed this matter with opposing counsel, and she does not oppose my request. 2 6. This is the fourth request for an extension to file the answer. 3 7. This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 4 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct 5 Executed on this 5th day of October 2020. 6 7 /s/ Allison Herr ALLISON HERR (Bar No. 5383) 8 9 10 11 12 13 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Amended Petition for Writ of habeas Corpus (ECF No. 89) is GRANTED. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file and answer to the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 44) on or before Wednesday, November 4, 2020. 15 21st IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of October, 2020. 16 17 18 19 __________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC Document 89 Filed 10/05/20 Page 4 of 4 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to File 3 Answer to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fourth Request) with the Clerk of the 4 Court by using the CM/ECF system on October 5, 2020. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 The following participants in this case are registered electronic filing system users and will be served electronically: Amelia L. Bizzaro Assistant Federal Public Defender Wisconsin State Bar No. 1045709 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 Amelia_Bizzaro@fd.org /s/ C. Martinez An employee of the Office of the Attorney General 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?