Dixon v. Baker et al

Filing 105

ORDER - Respondents' fourth motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 104 ) is GRANTED. The deadline to file the reply is April 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/28/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) Modified on 3/28/2022 to correct bold text (HKL).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 TERRY D. DIXON, 10 11 12 v. Petitioner, ORDER RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents. 13 Terry D. Dixon’s § 2254 habeas corpus petition is before the court on several 14 15 Case No. 3:13-cv-00248-RCJ-CSD unopposed motions for extension of time. Good cause appearing, 16 IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ third motion for extension of time to file a 17 response to petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 101) is GRANTED 18 nunc pro tunc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ fourth motion for extension of time 19 20 to file a response to petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 103) is 21 GRANTED. The deadline to respond to the motion for evidentiary hearing is April 1, 22 2022. 23 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED respondents’ third motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 102) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ fourth motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 104) is GRANTED. The deadline to file the reply is April 1, 2022. 5 6 7 DATED: 28 March 2022. 8 ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?