Dixon v. Baker et al

Filing 64

ORDER granting ECF No. 63 Motion to Extend Time : Response to ECF No. : 62 Motion for Discovery due by 7/29/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:13-cv-00248-RCJ-WGC Document 64 Filed 07/26/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 TERRY D. DIXON, 11 12 13 14 Case No. 3:13-cv-00248-RJC-WGC Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DISCOVERY (ECF NO. 62) vs. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents. (FIRST REQUEST) 15 16 Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of one week from the current due date 17 of July 22, 2021, up to an including July 29, 2021, in which to file their response to Dixon’s motion for 18 discovery (ECF No. 62). This Motion is made pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local 19 Rules of Practice and is based upon the attached declaration of counsel. This is the first enlargement of 20 time sought by Respondents to file the response, and the request is brought in good faith and not for the 21 purpose of delay. 22 DATED July 22, 2021. 23 Submitted by: 24 AARON D. FORD Attorney General 25 26 27 By: /s/ Jessica Perlick Jessica Perlick (Bar. No. 13218) Senior Deputy Attorney General 28 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:13-cv-00248-RCJ-WGC Document 64 Filed 07/26/21 Page 2 of 2 DECLARATION OF JESSICA PERLICK 1 2 3 STATE OF NEVADA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF CLARK ) 4 I, JESSICA PERLICK, being first duly sworn under oath, deposes and states as follows: 5 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada and am 6 employed as a Senior Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I have 7 been assigned to represent Respondents in Terry D. Dixon v. Renee Baker, et al., Case No. 3:13-cv- 8 00248-RJC-WGC, and as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein. 9 2. The deadline to file Respondents’ response to Dixon’s motion for discovery (ECF No. 62) 10 is July 22, 2021. 11 3. I have been unable with due diligence to complete the response herein. When Dixon filed 12 his motion, I was working through administrative tasks related to the internal transfer of a colleague, 13 including participation in interviews for the open position over the course of the last week. During this 14 time, I have also been working on a supplemental answer in Bollinger v. Gittere, 2:98-cv-01263 (capital 15 case); and a response to a petition in Elliott v. Russell, 3:20-cv-00529. 4. 16 Additionally, my supervisor went on medical leave yesterday, and I am assisting with 17 coverage in her absence. After receiving an adverse order in a colleague’s case, this coverage included 18 coordinating our internal procedures, which takes significant time and attention. As a result, I was unable 19 to complete the response to Dixon’s motion for discovery, and respectfully request a brief extension in 20 which to do so. 5. 21 22 I have communicated with counsel for Dixon, and she indicated that she does not object to this brief extension. 6. 23 For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully request an enlargement of time of one week, up 24 to an including July 29, 2021, in which to file the response to Dixon’s motion for discovery (ECF No. 25 62). 26 Executed on July 22, 2021. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 ______________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge DATED: July 26, 2021. /s/ Jessica Perlick Jessica Perlick (Bar No. 13218) Senior Deputy Attorney General Page 2 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?