Hillsman et al v. Morgan et al

Filing 15

ORDER VACATING 8 Order. Clerk shall reopen the case. Appellant shall have 14 days to file opening brief. Appellee shall have 14 days thereafter to file answering brief. Appellant shall have 14 days thereafter to file reply brief. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/2/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 In re ROSALIE ALLEN MORGAN, 9 Debtor. 10 11 ROBERT G. HILLSMAN, 12 13 Appellant, vs. 14 ROSALIE ALLEN MORGAN, 15 Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:13-cv-00256-RCJ Case No. 3:13-cv-00356-RCJ Adv. No. 12-ap-05066-BTB Bankr. No. 12-bk-51208-BTB ORDER 16 17 Plaintiff/Appellant Robert G. Hillsman filed an adversary proceeding in the Chapter 7 18 bankruptcy case of Debtor/Defendant/Appellee Rosalie Allen Morgan, listing two claims for 19 non-dischargeable debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a). The bankruptcy judge granted a motion to 20 dismiss with prejudice after a hearing. Appellant field an appeal but did not file a designation of 21 record on appeal or a statement of issues. On November 11, 2013, the Court ordered Appellant 22 to file an opening brief within fourteen days. He did not do so and has yet filed no opening brief. 23 Appellee moved to dismiss for the first reason and moved for summary judgment for the second 24 reason. Appellant did not timely respond to either motion, so the Court granted them. See L.R. 25 Bank. P. 8070(a). 1 Appellant has now moved for relief from judgment for excusable neglect under Rule 2 59(e) or 60(b)(1). Appellant argues that the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court directed him to file 3 the designation of record on appeal and statement of issues with the Clerk of the Bankruptcy 4 Court within fourteen days of the Notice of Appeal, and that he complied, but that the Clerk of 5 the Bankruptcy Court delayed forwarding those documents to the Clerk of the District Court 6 because certain transcripts had not yet been filed. Appellant notes that the Clerk of the 7 Bankruptcy Court certified the record for transfer on August 27, 2013, but that the Clerk of the 8 District Court never requested transfer. Also, Attorney Bowler notes that he left his prior law 9 firm on August 31, 2013 and unintentionally neglected to update his contact information with the 10 Court, the present case being his only case in this Court for the last few years. He only received 11 notice of the Court’s order in this case because it was also entered into the docket of the 12 adversary proceeding, and he had updated his address in the Bankruptcy Court. That is why 13 Appellee failed to respond to the previous motions in this Court or to file an opening 14 brief—Appellee’s attorney had not received copies of the motions or the minute order setting the 15 briefing schedule. 16 The Court agrees that Appellant’s neglect is excusable under the factors set forth in 17 Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnership, 507 U.S. 380, 395 18 (1993). Appellant will not be prejudiced by a reopening of the appeal for a determination on the 19 merits; the delay is minimal; the reason for the delay was administrative neglect, not tactical; and 20 there is no indication of bad faith. The Court will therefore vacate its previous order and reset 21 the briefing schedule. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order (ECF No. 8) is VACATED, and the Clerk shall reopen the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant shall have fourteen (14) days from the entry 5 of this Order into the electronic docket to file and serve an opening brief, Appellee shall have 6 fourteen (14) days thereafter to file and serve an answering brief, and Appellant shall have 7 fourteen (14) days thereafter to file and serve a reply brief. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 2nd day of June, 2014. Dated this 27th day of May, 2014. 10 11 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?