Hillsman et al v. Morgan et al
Filing
15
ORDER VACATING 8 Order. Clerk shall reopen the case. Appellant shall have 14 days to file opening brief. Appellee shall have 14 days thereafter to file answering brief. Appellant shall have 14 days thereafter to file reply brief. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/2/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
In re ROSALIE ALLEN MORGAN,
9
Debtor.
10
11
ROBERT G. HILLSMAN,
12
13
Appellant,
vs.
14
ROSALIE ALLEN MORGAN,
15
Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:13-cv-00256-RCJ
Case No. 3:13-cv-00356-RCJ
Adv. No. 12-ap-05066-BTB
Bankr. No. 12-bk-51208-BTB
ORDER
16
17
Plaintiff/Appellant Robert G. Hillsman filed an adversary proceeding in the Chapter 7
18
bankruptcy case of Debtor/Defendant/Appellee Rosalie Allen Morgan, listing two claims for
19
non-dischargeable debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a). The bankruptcy judge granted a motion to
20
dismiss with prejudice after a hearing. Appellant field an appeal but did not file a designation of
21
record on appeal or a statement of issues. On November 11, 2013, the Court ordered Appellant
22
to file an opening brief within fourteen days. He did not do so and has yet filed no opening brief.
23
Appellee moved to dismiss for the first reason and moved for summary judgment for the second
24
reason. Appellant did not timely respond to either motion, so the Court granted them. See L.R.
25
Bank. P. 8070(a).
1
Appellant has now moved for relief from judgment for excusable neglect under Rule
2
59(e) or 60(b)(1). Appellant argues that the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court directed him to file
3
the designation of record on appeal and statement of issues with the Clerk of the Bankruptcy
4
Court within fourteen days of the Notice of Appeal, and that he complied, but that the Clerk of
5
the Bankruptcy Court delayed forwarding those documents to the Clerk of the District Court
6
because certain transcripts had not yet been filed. Appellant notes that the Clerk of the
7
Bankruptcy Court certified the record for transfer on August 27, 2013, but that the Clerk of the
8
District Court never requested transfer. Also, Attorney Bowler notes that he left his prior law
9
firm on August 31, 2013 and unintentionally neglected to update his contact information with the
10
Court, the present case being his only case in this Court for the last few years. He only received
11
notice of the Court’s order in this case because it was also entered into the docket of the
12
adversary proceeding, and he had updated his address in the Bankruptcy Court. That is why
13
Appellee failed to respond to the previous motions in this Court or to file an opening
14
brief—Appellee’s attorney had not received copies of the motions or the minute order setting the
15
briefing schedule.
16
The Court agrees that Appellant’s neglect is excusable under the factors set forth in
17
Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnership, 507 U.S. 380, 395
18
(1993). Appellant will not be prejudiced by a reopening of the appeal for a determination on the
19
merits; the delay is minimal; the reason for the delay was administrative neglect, not tactical; and
20
there is no indication of bad faith. The Court will therefore vacate its previous order and reset
21
the briefing schedule.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order (ECF No. 8) is VACATED, and the Clerk
shall reopen the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant shall have fourteen (14) days from the entry
5
of this Order into the electronic docket to file and serve an opening brief, Appellee shall have
6
fourteen (14) days thereafter to file and serve an answering brief, and Appellant shall have
7
fourteen (14) days thereafter to file and serve a reply brief.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
2nd day of June, 2014.
Dated this 27th day of May, 2014.
10
11
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?