Hillsman et al v. Morgan et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss and granting 7 Motion for Summary Judgment as a motion to dismiss. The clerk shall close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/17/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 In re ROSALIE ALLEN MORGAN, 9 Debtor. 10 11 ROBERT G. HILLSMAN, 12 13 Appellant, vs. 14 ROSALIE ALLEN MORGAN, 15 Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:13-cv-00256-RCJ Case No. 3:13-cv-00356-RCJ Adv. No. 12-ap-05066-BTB Bankr. No. 12-bk-51208-BTB ORDER 16 17 Plaintiff/Appellant Robert G. Hillsman filed an adversary proceeding in the Chapter 7 18 bankruptcy case of Debtor/Defendant/Appellee Rosalie Allen Morgan, listing two claims for 19 non-dischargeable debt under 11 U.S.C. ยง 523(a). The bankruptcy judge granted a motion to 20 dismiss with prejudice after a hearing. Plaintiff appealed. Appellant has not filed a designation 21 of record on appeal or a statement of issues. On November 11, 2013, the Court ordered 22 Appellant to file an opening brief within fourteen days. He did not do so and has yet filed no 23 opening brief. Appellee has moved to dismiss for the first reason and has moved for summary 24 judgment for the second reason. Appellant has not timely responded to either motion. The Court 25 grants the motions. See L.R. Bank. P. 8070(a). 1 CONCLUSION 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 7) is 4 GRANTED as a motion to dismiss. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall close the case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated this 6th daydayJanuary, 2014.2014. Dated this 17th of of January, 8 9 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?