United States of America v. $44,001.00 in United States Currency

Filing 12

JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE against $44,001.00 in United States Currency. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/31/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 9 10 11 12 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) $44,001.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, ) ) Defendant. ) 3:13-cv-285-MMD-VPC JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE (Proposed) 13 14 A verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem was filed on May 30, 2013. The Complaint 15 alleges that the defendant U.S. Currency described in the caption, and all of such U.S. Currency, is 16 property which constitutes proceeds traceable to the exchange of controlled substances in violation 17 of Title II of the Controlled Substances Act (21 USC § 801, et seq.) or constitutes money furnished 18 or intended to be furnished by a person in exchange for a controlled substance or listed chemical in 19 violation of Title II of the Controlled Substances Act and is, therefore, subject to forfeiture to the 20 United States of America pursuant to 21 USC § 881(a)(6). 21 Process was fully issued in this action and returned according to law. 22 Pursuant to a Summons and Warrant of Arrest in Rem for the Property issued by this Court 23 on June4, 2013, the United States Marshals Service arrested the defendant property on June 14, 2013. 24 Appropriate public notice of this forfeiture action and arrest was given to all persons and 25 entities by publication of an appropriate notice via the official internet government forfeiture site, 26 www.forfeiture.gov, compliant with Rule G(4), Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims 1 and Asset Forfeiture Actions. 2 Statutory notice of this action compliant with Rule G(4), Supplemental Rules for Admiralty 3 or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, was given to known prospective claimants, 4 including Gurdeep Singh and Arshia Bhatia. 5 No claim, answer, or other responsive pleading has been filed on behalf of any person. Default 6 was entered on July 17, 2013, of the defendant funds, specified individuals and entities, and all other 7 persons or entities who claim an interest in the defendant property. 8 Now, therefore, good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND 9 DECREED that Judgment be and is entered against the defendant 10 $44,001.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY 11 and against all persons and/or entities, having any interest in such property and that the defendant 12 property be, and the same is, hereby forfeited to the United States of America and no right, title, or 13 interest in the defendant property shall exist in any other party. The defendant property shall be 14 disposed of according to law. 15 16 17 October 31 Date: ______________, 2013 __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?