Hill v. Baca et al

Filing 86

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , and 80 Motions. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9

CHARLES H. HILL,

10

Plaintiff,

11

vs.

12

Case No. 3:13-cv-00291-RCJ-WGC

ISIDRO BACA, et al.,

13

ORDER

Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiff has submitted an amended motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)

16

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (#75). Plaintiff still is trying to re-litigate the issues that he

17

raised, and that the court rejected, in a long-closed action. The court denies this motion.

18

Plaintiff also has submitted a motion for appointment of counsel (#76), a request for Rule 4

19

service by U.S. Marshal (#77), a request for Rule 45 subpoena duces tecum (#78), a request for

20

submission on deficiency document (#79), and a status check request (#80). The court denies all

21

these motions and requests because the court is not granting plaintiff relief from the judgment.

22
23
24

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all of plaintiff’s pending motions on the docket (#75,
#76, #77, #78, #79, #80) are DENIED.
Dated:

October 28, 2014.

25
26
27
28

_________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge