Dewey v. Myles
Filing
61
ORDER granting ECF No. 60 Motion for Enlargement of Time. Respondents' answer/response to petition due 1/16/2018. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in Order ECF No. 58 shall remain in effect. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
SHELLI ROSE DEWEY,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
3:13-cv-00317-LRH-WGC
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
ORDER
13
14
Respondents.
_____________________________/
15
In this habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Nevada prisoner Shelli Rose Dewey, filed a
16
second amended petition on September 18, 2017 (ECF No. 59). The respondents were due to
17
respond to the second amended petition by November 17, 2017. See Order entered July 20, 2017
18
(ECF No. 58) (60 days for response).
19
On November 17, 2017, respondents filed a motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 60),
20
requesting a 60-day extension of time, to January 16, 2018. This would be the first extension of this
21
deadline. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of his
22
obligations in other cases. Dewey does not oppose the motion for extension of time. The Court
23
finds that respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the
24
purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time requested.
25
///
26
///
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time
2
(ECF No. 60) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until January 16, 2018, to answer or
3
otherwise respond to the petitioner’s second amended habeas petition.
4
5
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further
proceedings set forth in the order entered July 20, 2017 (ECF No. 58) shall remain in effect.
DATED this 21st day of November, 2017.
7
8
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?