Rodney v. Baker et al
Filing
87
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 86 ) (First Request) is GRANTED. Respondents' answering brief is due by February 8, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)
Case 3:13-cv-00323-RCJ-VPC Document 87 Filed 12/21/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
KYLE J. RODNEY,
Petitioner,
11
12
vs.
13
Case No. 3:13-cv-00323-RCJ-VPC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSIVE BRIEF
WARDEN BAKER, et al.,
(FIRST REQUEST)
Respondents.
14
15
Respondents, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada,
16
hereby respectfully move this Court for an order granting a sixty (60) day enlargement of time, to and
17
including February 8, 2022, in which to file and serve their responsive brief pursuant to the scheduling
18
order entered by this Court on July 13, 2021. ECF No. 78.
19
This motion is based upon the provisions of Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
20
and the attached Declaration of Counsel, as well as all other papers, documents, records, pleadings, and
21
other materials on file herein.
22
This is undersigned counsel’s first request for an enlargement of Respondents’ time to file said
23
response; the motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of unduly delaying the ultimate
24
disposition of this case; and the Assistant Federal Public Defender has indicated there is no objection.
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 86) is
GRANTED.
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
Dated: December 21, 2021.
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?