Rodney v. Baker et al

Filing 96

ORDER - The unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 95 ) is GRANTED. The brief is now due by Tuesday, 8/23/2022. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/10/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

Download PDF
Case 3:13-cv-00323-RCJ-VPC Document 96 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 9 10 11 KYLE J. RODNEY, v. Case No. 3:13-cv-00323-RCJ Petitioner, ORDER WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Petitioner Kyle J. Rodney, through counsel, moves this Court for the entry of an order extending the time within which he must file his reply brief on the issue of cause and prejudice under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), and the merits of his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The brief is currently due on June 9, 2022. Mr. Rodney requests a 75-day extension, up to and including Tuesday, August 23, 2022. Respondents do not object to this request for an extension. Rodney has established good cause for the extension. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 95) is GRANTED. DATED THIS 10th day of June, 2022. 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?