Williams v. Baker et al

Filing 48

ORDERED the # 40 Motion to find the motion for enlargement of time moot is granted. FURTHER ORD the # 41 Motion to clarify mailing discrepancies is granted. FURTHER ORD the # 42 Motion to have clerk send a file-stamped copy of P's reply to answer is granted. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall send P a copy of his # 39 Reply to answer. (Mailed to P 6/2/2015.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/1/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12

)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
RENEE BAKER et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
)
___________________________________ )

13

I.

7
8
9
10
11

MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS,

3:13-cv-334-RCJ-WGC
ORDER

DISCUSSION

14

On November 20, 2014, Petitioner filed a motion to find moot his motion for a ten day

15

enlargement of time to file a reply. (ECF No. 40). The Court grants this motion and finds his

16

motion for an enlargement of time moot.
On November 24, 2014, Petitioner filed a motion to clarify mailing discrepancies and

17
18

for the Court to accept his reply.

(ECF No. 41).

The Court grants this motion and

19

acknowledges the filing of Plaintiff’s reply to answer (ECF No. 39).

20

On December 2, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order directing the court clerk to

21

return a file-stamped copy of his reply to answer filed on November 20, 2014. (ECF No. 42).

22

The Court grants Plaintiff’s motion and directs the Clerk of the Court to send Plaintiff a copy

23

of his reply to answer (ECF No. 39).

24

II.

25
26
27
28

CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to find the motion for

enlargement of time moot (ECF No. 40) is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to clarify mailing discrepancies (ECF No.
41) is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to have the court clerk send a file-stamped

1
2
3

copy of Petitioner’s reply to answer (ECF No. 42) is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Petitioner a copy of
his reply to answer (ECF No. 39).

4
5

Dated: June 1, 2015. day of May, 2015.
DATED: This _____

6
7

_________________________________
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2