Beverly, Trustee of the Beverly-Blair Meadowridge Trust v. Weaver-Farley et al
Filing
21
ORDER EXTINGUISHING LIS PENDENS re 20 Proposed Order Submission. Plaintiff shall record a copy of this Order or other appropriate notice cancelling the Notice of Pendency of Action or Lis Pendens with the Washoe County Recorder's Office within 5 business days of its entry, and if there is a failure to do so, any party may record a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Case 3:13-cv-00348-LRH-VPC Document 20 Filed 10/19/13 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Chelsea A. Crowton, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11547
5532 South Fort Apache Road, Suite II 0
Las Vegas, NV 89148
(702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345
ccrowton(ci)wri ghtlegal.net
Attorney for Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, NA.
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
Case No.: 3:13-CV-00348-RH-VPC
NADINA BEVERLY, Trustee of the
BEVERLY-BLAIR MEADOWRIDGE
TRUST,
ORDER EXTINGUISHING
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
LIS PENDENS
EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS
Plaintiff
11
VS.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GAYLE WEAVER-FARLEY, also known as
GAYLE FARLEY, individually and as trustee
ofThe 2005 GAYLE WEAVER-FARLEY
FAMILY TRUST DATED MAY 18, 2005;
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE
CORPORATION, a California corporation;
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; OHIO
SAVINGS BANK; and DOES I through X,
Defendants.
19
20
The Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice the
21
Plaintiffs Complaint and Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens on June 28, 2013 as Docket Numbers
22
2 and 3. The Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Expunge Lis
23
Pendens on July 15,2013 as Docket Numbers 12 and 13. The Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank,
24
N.A., filed a Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens on
25
July 26,2013 and July 31,2013 as Docket Numbers 14 and 15. On October 9, 2013, the Court
26
having considered all arguments presented, the pleadings on file herein, and the Court
27
determining that good cause appearing, entered an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss and
28
Page I of 3
1
Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens as Docket Number 18. Pursuant to the Court’s Order entered on
2
October 9, 2013, the Court hereby rules as follows:
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that any Pendency of Action
4
or Lis Pendens recorded by the Plaintiff in the Official Records of Washoe County, Nevada on May
5
31, 2013 as Document Number 4243172, relating to this action and the real property that is subject
6
of this action located at 6369 Meadow Crest CL, Reno, Nevada, 89509, APN: 041-200-08 legally
7
described as:
8
PARCEL 1:
9
LOT 8 IN BLOCK A OF MEADOWRIDGE UNIT NO. 1-C, ACCORDING TO THE MAP
THEREOF, FILED I THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF WASHOE
COUNTY, STATE OF NEVADA, ON NOVEMBER 02, 1978, UNDER FILING NO.
568098, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
10
11
PARCEL 2:
12
13
14
EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE SECTIONS ENTITLED “CERTAIN
EASEMENTS FOR OWNERS” AND “SUPPORT, SETTLEMENT AND
ENCROACHMENT” OF THE ARTICLE ENTITLED “EASEMENTS” OF THE
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, RECORDED
MARCH 28, 1978, AS DOCUMENT NO. 522153.
15
16
17
is hereby cancelled, expunged, or voided, pursuant to N.R.S. 14.015 and it shall have from
this day forward have no force or effect.
18
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to
19
N.R.S. 14.015(5), the Plaintiff shall record a copy of this Order or other appropriate notice cancelling
20
the Notice of Pendency of Action or Lis Pendens, with the Washoe County Recorder’s Office within
21
five (5) business days of its entry, and if there is a failure to do so, any party may record a copy of
22
this Order.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED,
24
22nd day of October, 2013.
DATED this ___ day of October, 2013.
25
26
27
28
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?