Ochoa v. Baker et al

Filing 6

ORDER denying 5 Motion - Application Seeking to File Injunction. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/23/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

1
2
3

ARTURO TORRES OCHOA,

4

Plaintiff,

5

vs.

6
7

RENEE BAKER et al.,
Defendants.

8
9
10

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

3:13-cv-00449-RCJ-WGC
ORDER

The Court dismissed this prisoner civil rights action and ordered the case closed on

11
12

September 16, 2013. (Order, ECF No. 3). Specifically, the Court noted that “plaintiff has filed

13

numerous meritless, frivolous and/or delusional actions in this district,” (id. at 1), denied the

14

application to proceed in forma pauperis, (id. at 2), and dismissed the action “without prejudice

15

to the filing of a new complaint on the required form in a new action together with either a new

16

pauper application with all required, and new, attachments or payment of the $350.00 filing
17
18

fee,” (id. (emphasis added)). Pursuant to the Court’s order, the Clerk of the Court entered final

19

judgment accordingly. (Judgment, ECF No. 4). Plaintiff has now filed a handwritten, partially

20

illegible “Application Seeking to File Injunction.” (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff has not filed a new

21
22

complaint, used the required forms, docketed a new pauper application, or paid the $350.00
filing fee. Therefore, based on the Court’s prior order, the pending “application” is denied.

23
24

///

25
26
27
28

1

CONCLUSION

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pending motion (ECF No. 5) is DENIED.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6
7

July 23, 2014
Dated: _______________________.
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2