Sargant vs HG Staffing, LLC

Filing 261

ORDER granting ECF No. 260 Stipulation for Extension to file opposition to Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , and 258 ). Plaintiffs' opposition due by 3/29/2018. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) Modified on 3/15/2018 to correct ECF No. (LH).

Download PDF
Case 3:13-cv-00453-LRH-WGC Document 260 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THIERMAN BUCK, LLP 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email: info@thiermanbuck.com; www.thiermanbuck.com 8 THIERMAN BUCK, LLP Mark R. Thierman, Esq. (Nev. Bar No. 8285) mark@thiermanbuck.com Joshua D. Buck, Esq. (Nev. Bar No. 12187) josh@thiermanbuck.com Leah L. Jones, Esq. (Nev. Bar No. 13161) leah@thiermanbuck.com 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89511 Telephone: (775) 284-1500 Fax: (775) 703-5027 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TIFFANY SARGENT, BAILEY CRYDERMAN, SAMANTHA L. IGNACIO (formerly SCHNEIDER) VINCENT M. IGNACIO, HUONG (“ROSIE”) BOGGS,and JACQULYN WIEDERHOLT on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case No.: 3:13-cv-453-LRH-WGC STIPULATION AND EXTENDING OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ALL REMAINING CLAIMS (First Request) v. AND ORDER THEREON HG STAFFING, LLC, MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a GRAND SIERRA RESORT, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 24 Plaintiffs, TIFFANY SARGENT, BAILEY CRYDERMAN, SAMANTHA L. IGNACIO 25 (formerly SCHNEIDER), VINCENT M. IGNACIO, HUONG (“ROSIE”) BOGGS, and 26 JACQULYN WIEDERHOLT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 27 (hereinafter “Plaintiffs), and Defendants, HG STAFFING, LLC, and MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, 28 LLC d/b/a GRAND SIERRA RESORT, (hereinafter “Defendants”) by and through their -1- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case 3:13-cv-00453-LRH-WGC Document 260 Filed 03/14/18 Page 2 of 2 1 respective counsel of record, do hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time to respond to 2 Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment on all remaining claims filed on March 2, 2018, 3 (ECF Nos. 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, and 258), by six (6) calendar days, from Friday, March 23, 4 2018, up to and including Thursday, March 29, 2018. This extension is requested in good faith 5 because six dispositive motions will have to be opposed, and because the reinstated state law 6 wage claims are of a complex and fact intensive nature, all of which require additional time to 7 analyze the law, and draft responsive dispositive motions. THIERMAN BUCK, LLP 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, NV 89511 (775) 284-1500 Fax (775) 703-5027 Email: info@thiermanbuck.com; www.thiermanbuck.com 8 Accordingly, based on the foregoing and for good cause appearing, the Parties, by and 9 through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree that the time for 10 Plaintiffs’ to Oppose Defendants’ renewed Motions for Summary Judgment, is extended and now 11 due on Thursday, March 29, 2018. 12 DATED this 14th day of March, 2018. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THIERMAN LAW FIRM COHEN-JOHNSON, LLC /s/Leah L. Jones Mark R. Thierman, Esq., Nev. Bar No. 8285 Joshua D. Buck, Esq., Nev. Bar No. 12187 Leah L. Jones, Esq. Nev. Bar No. 13161 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89511 Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/Chris Davis H. Stan Johnson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 00265 Chris Davis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6616 375 E Warm Springs Rd., Suite 104 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Attorneys for Defendants 20 ORDER 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED this 15th day of March, 2018. Dated this ___ day of March 2018. 24 25 26 _______________________________________ UNITEDR. HICKSDISTRICT COURT JUDGE LARRY STATES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 -2- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?