Sargant vs HG Staffing, LLC

Filing 274

ORDER granting ECF No. 272 Stipulation Extending time to file Replies to ECF Nos. 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 272 and 273 Motions for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 5/4/2018. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Case 3:13-cv-00453-LRH-WGC Document 272 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

COHEN|JOHNSON|PARKER|EDWARDS
H. STAN JOHNSON, ESQ.
Nevada bar No. 00265
[e-mail]
CHRIS DAVIS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6616
[e-mail]
375 East Warm Springs Road, Suite 104
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

11
12
375 E. Warm Springs Road, Ste. 104
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
[phone] FAX: [phone]

COHEN|JOHNSON|PARKER|EDWARDS

10

13
14

TIFFANY SARGENT, BAILEY
CRYDERMAN, SAMANTHA L. IGNACIO
(formerly SCHNEIDER), VINCENT M.
IGNACIO, HUONG (“ROSIE”) BOGGS, and
JACQULYN WIEDERHOLT,
Plaintiffs,

15
V.
16
17
18
19

Case No. 3:13-cv-00453-LRH-WGC

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING THE TIME TO FILE
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HG STAFFING, LLC, MEI-GSR
HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a GRAND SIERRA
RESORT, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

20
Plaintiffs, TIFFANY SARGENT, BAILEY CRYDERMAN, VINCENT M. IGNACIO,
21
22
23

SAMANTHA L. IGNACIO (formerly SCHNEIDER), HUONG (“ROSIE”) BOGGS, and
JACQULYN WIEDERHOLT (“Plaintiffs) and Defendants HG STAFFING, LLC, and MEIGSR HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a GRAND SIERRA RESORT (“Defendants” or “GSR”), by and

24
through their respective counsel of record, agree to extend the time for Defendants to file their
25
26
27

replies in support of Defendants’ six (6) dispositive motions by two (2) weeks. This extension is
requested in good faith because six (6) replies in support of Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment need to be filed, and because Plaintiffs’ oppositions to Defendants’ motions for

28
Page 1 of 2

Case 3:13-cv-00453-LRH-WGC Document 272 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 2

1

summary judgment involve newly reinstated state law wage claims which are of a complex and

2

fact intensive nature, all of which require additional time to analyze the newly asserted facts and

3

law, and draft replies in support of the motions for summary judgment.

4

Accordingly, based on the foregoing and for good cause appearing, the parties, by and

5

through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree that the time for

6

Defendants to file their six (6) replies in support of Defendants’ renewed motions for summary

7

judgment, is extended by two (2) weeks and is now due on Friday, May 4, 2018.

8
9

11
12
375 E. Warm Springs Road, Ste. 104
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
[phone] FAX: [phone]

COHEN|JOHNSON|PARKER|EDWARDS

10

13
14
15

Dated this 20th day of April 2018.
COHEN|JOHNSON|PARKER|EDWARDS

THIERMAN BUCK, LLP

By: /s/ H. Stan Johnson
H. Stan Johnson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 00265
Chris Davis, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6616
375 E Warm Springs Rd., Suite 104
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Attorneys for Defendants

_

By: /s/ Leah L. Jones, Esq.
Leah L. Jones, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13161
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

16
17
18
19
20

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED., nunc pro tunc.
DATED this 24th day of April, 2018.
DATED this
day of

, 2018.

21
22
23

JUDGE R. HICKS
LARRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2

_