Snelson v. Washoe County Detention Facility

Filing 24

ORDER adopting and accepting 20 Report and Recommendation; denying 18 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 12 Motion to Dismiss and 13 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 ALEX C. SNELSON, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 v. 11 12 WASHOE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 13 Defendant. * ** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-00456-RCJ-VPC ORDER 14 The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 15 (ECF #20) entered on July 1, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny as 16 moot Washoe County Detention Facility’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF #12) and Defendants Shearer, 17 Huynh, Avina and Petit’s Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF #13) and that the action proceed 18 on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF #17). The Court has considered the pleadings and 19 memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and 20 determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and 21 good cause appearing, the court hereby 22 ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States 23 Magistrate Judge (ECF #20). 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Strike Amended Complaint (ECF #18) is DENIED. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Washoe County Detention Facility’s Motion 4 to Dismiss (ECF #12) AND Defendants’ Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF #13) are 5 DENIED AS MOOT. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2014. 7 8 9 _______________________________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?