LVDG Series 125 established under LVDG, LLC, a Nevada series limited liability company v. Welles et al
Filing
82
ORDER granting ECF No. 81 Stipulation to Extend Litigation Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
7
Andrew Jacobs, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12787
Wayne Klomp, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10109
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, Nevada 89501-1961
Telephone: (775) 785-5440
Facsimile: (775) 784-5441
Email: ajacobs@swlaw.com
wklomp@swlaw.com
8
Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, Nevada 89501
775.785.5440
12
LVDG SERIES 125, established under
LVDG LLC, a Nevada series limited-liability
company,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
vs.
23
24
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national
association,
Counter-Claimant,
vs.
LVDG SERIES 125, established under
LVDG LLC, a Nevada series limited-liability
company,
25
Counter-Defendant.
26
27
(First Request)
Defendants.
21
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINES
HAROLD M. WELLES; VALERIE M.
WELLES; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
MTC FINANCIAL INC. d/b/a TRUSTEE
CORPS, DOES 1 THROUGH 20, and ROE
CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 20,
INCLUSIVE
19
20
Case No. 3:13-cv-00503-LRH-WGC
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) together with LVDG Series 125, established under LVDG LLC
28
-125043341
1
(“LVDG”) and MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps (“MTC Financial” and jointly with Wells
2
Fargo and LVDG, the “Parties”), through their respective attorneys, as follows:
STIPULATION
3
4
WHEREAS, LVDG filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 63) on July 21, 2016
5
pursuant to an order of this Court granting LVDG appropriate leave to add parties and amend its
6
Complaint; and
7
WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint names Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
8
(“Freddie Mac”) as a new defendant. In addition, it amends the claims that were previously
9
brought against Harold M. Welles and Valerie M. Welles (collectively, the “Welles”).
WHEREAS, summonses for service of the Amended Complaint have been issued against
10
11
new Defendant Freddie Mac, as well as the Welles. (ECF Nos. 74-76); and
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, Nevada 89501
775.785.5440
12
WHEREAS, Freddie Mac was served with the summons and Amended Complaint on
13
October 17, 2016 (ECF No. 78) and the Welles were served with the summons and Amended
14
Complaint on October 17 and October 18, 2016, respectively (ECF No. 78-80).
WHEREAS, although counsel for Wells Fargo Bank may represent Freddie Mac, neither
15
16
Freddie Mac or the Welles have yet appeared in response to the Amended Complaint.
WHEREAS, the Parties understand and agree that additional discovery and motion
17
18
practice will be necessary once Freddie Mac and the Welles appear; and
WHEREAS, MTC Financial has filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 64) the Amended
19
20
Complaint, which Motion has been fully briefed; and
WHEREAS, Wells Fargo and LVDG have agreed that Wells Fargo’s response to the
21
22
Amended Complaint will be due on the same date as the response due by Freddie Mac; and
WHEREAS, the current litigation deadlines are to be reset upon the appearance of Freddie
23
24
Mac and the Welles.
25
NOW THEREFORE the Parties agree and request this Court enter an order allowing for
26
an extension of the current litigation deadlines to be reset once Freddie Mac and the Welles have
27
appeared in this case. The Parties further agree to appear for a status conference at the request of
28
the court. The Parties agree that this request for extending discovery and dispositive motions
-225043341
1
deadlines is made in good faith and not for any improper purpose, but rather to afford the Parties
2
and the newly appearing parties the opportunity to complete discovery in this litigation and with
3
respect to the Amended Complaint.
4
Because Freddie Mac and the Welles have not yet appeared, the Parties agree that upon
5
the appearance of said defendants, they will meet and confer to propose new litigation deadlines
6
consistent with the needs of all parties and the claims and defenses of this case. The Parties
7
further agree that they will consider those elements contained in the Court’s Minute Order (ECF
8
No. 51) and will submit a supplemental Case Management Report consistent with the Court’s
9
Minute Order.
This is the Parties’ first request to extend litigation deadlines.
10
Snell & Wilmer
DATED this 20th day of October, 2016.
DATED this 20th day of October, 2016.
12
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, Nevada 89501
775.785.5440
11
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Wayne Klomp
Andrew Jacobs, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12787
Wayne Klomp, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10109
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, Nevada 89501
Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
/s/ Timothy E. Rhoda
Roger P. Croteau, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 4958
Timothy E. Rhoda, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7878
9120 West Post Rd, Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Attorneys for LVDG
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
(Remaining Signatures on Following Page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-325043341
(Remaining Signatures and Order re Stipulation to Extend Litigation Deadlines)
1
2
3
4
DATED this 20th day of October, 2016.
BROOKS HUBLEY, LLP
5
6
7
8
9
/s/ Michael R. Brooks
Michael R. Brooks, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7287
1645 Village Center Cir., #60
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorneys for MTC Financial
10
11
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, Nevada 89501
775.785.5440
12
ORDER
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
October 21, 2016.
DATED:
________________________
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-425043341
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?