LVDG Series 125 established under LVDG, LLC, a Nevada series limited liability company v. Welles et al

Filing 82

ORDER granting ECF No. 81 Stipulation to Extend Litigation Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 7 Andrew Jacobs, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12787 Wayne Klomp, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10109 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501-1961 Telephone: (775) 785-5440 Facsimile: (775) 784-5441 Email: ajacobs@swlaw.com wklomp@swlaw.com 8 Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 775.785.5440 12 LVDG SERIES 125, established under LVDG LLC, a Nevada series limited-liability company, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. 23 24 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national association, Counter-Claimant, vs. LVDG SERIES 125, established under LVDG LLC, a Nevada series limited-liability company, 25 Counter-Defendant. 26 27 (First Request) Defendants. 21 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINES HAROLD M. WELLES; VALERIE M. WELLES; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MTC FINANCIAL INC. d/b/a TRUSTEE CORPS, DOES 1 THROUGH 20, and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE 19 20 Case No. 3:13-cv-00503-LRH-WGC Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) together with LVDG Series 125, established under LVDG LLC 28 -125043341 1 (“LVDG”) and MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps (“MTC Financial” and jointly with Wells 2 Fargo and LVDG, the “Parties”), through their respective attorneys, as follows: STIPULATION 3 4 WHEREAS, LVDG filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 63) on July 21, 2016 5 pursuant to an order of this Court granting LVDG appropriate leave to add parties and amend its 6 Complaint; and 7 WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint names Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 8 (“Freddie Mac”) as a new defendant. In addition, it amends the claims that were previously 9 brought against Harold M. Welles and Valerie M. Welles (collectively, the “Welles”). WHEREAS, summonses for service of the Amended Complaint have been issued against 10 11 new Defendant Freddie Mac, as well as the Welles. (ECF Nos. 74-76); and Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 775.785.5440 12 WHEREAS, Freddie Mac was served with the summons and Amended Complaint on 13 October 17, 2016 (ECF No. 78) and the Welles were served with the summons and Amended 14 Complaint on October 17 and October 18, 2016, respectively (ECF No. 78-80). WHEREAS, although counsel for Wells Fargo Bank may represent Freddie Mac, neither 15 16 Freddie Mac or the Welles have yet appeared in response to the Amended Complaint. WHEREAS, the Parties understand and agree that additional discovery and motion 17 18 practice will be necessary once Freddie Mac and the Welles appear; and WHEREAS, MTC Financial has filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 64) the Amended 19 20 Complaint, which Motion has been fully briefed; and WHEREAS, Wells Fargo and LVDG have agreed that Wells Fargo’s response to the 21 22 Amended Complaint will be due on the same date as the response due by Freddie Mac; and WHEREAS, the current litigation deadlines are to be reset upon the appearance of Freddie 23 24 Mac and the Welles. 25 NOW THEREFORE the Parties agree and request this Court enter an order allowing for 26 an extension of the current litigation deadlines to be reset once Freddie Mac and the Welles have 27 appeared in this case. The Parties further agree to appear for a status conference at the request of 28 the court. The Parties agree that this request for extending discovery and dispositive motions -225043341 1 deadlines is made in good faith and not for any improper purpose, but rather to afford the Parties 2 and the newly appearing parties the opportunity to complete discovery in this litigation and with 3 respect to the Amended Complaint. 4 Because Freddie Mac and the Welles have not yet appeared, the Parties agree that upon 5 the appearance of said defendants, they will meet and confer to propose new litigation deadlines 6 consistent with the needs of all parties and the claims and defenses of this case. The Parties 7 further agree that they will consider those elements contained in the Court’s Minute Order (ECF 8 No. 51) and will submit a supplemental Case Management Report consistent with the Court’s 9 Minute Order. This is the Parties’ first request to extend litigation deadlines. 10 Snell & Wilmer DATED this 20th day of October, 2016. DATED this 20th day of October, 2016. 12 L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 775.785.5440 11 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES /s/ Wayne Klomp Andrew Jacobs, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12787 Wayne Klomp, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10109 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. /s/ Timothy E. Rhoda Roger P. Croteau, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4958 Timothy E. Rhoda, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7878 9120 West Post Rd, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Attorneys for LVDG 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (Remaining Signatures on Following Page) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -325043341 (Remaining Signatures and Order re Stipulation to Extend Litigation Deadlines) 1 2 3 4 DATED this 20th day of October, 2016. BROOKS HUBLEY, LLP 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Michael R. Brooks Michael R. Brooks, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7287 1645 Village Center Cir., #60 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Attorneys for MTC Financial 10 11 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 775.785.5440 12 ORDER 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE October 21, 2016. DATED: ________________________ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -425043341

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?