Holt v. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER - The court ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the # 17 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Plaintiff's # 11 Motion for Reversal and/or Remand is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's # 15 Cross-Motion for SummaryJudgment is GRANTED, and the decision of the ALJ is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
LORRIE A. HOLT,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
12
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
13
Defendants.
* **
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-00524-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
14
15
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
16
(ECF #17) entered on August 7, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny
17
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal and/or Remand (ECF #11), grant Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for
18
Summary Judgment (ECF #15) and affirm the decision of the ALJ. The Court has considered the
19
pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review
20
and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law,
21
and good cause appearing, the court hereby
22
23
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge (ECF #17).
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal and/or Remand (ECF #11)
25
is DENIED.
26
///
///
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF #15) is GRANTED, and the decision of the ALJ is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of August, 2014.
4
5
6
_______________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?