Holt v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER - The court ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the # 17 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Plaintiff's # 11 Motion for Reversal and/or Remand is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's # 15 Cross-Motion for SummaryJudgment is GRANTED, and the decision of the ALJ is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 LORRIE A. HOLT, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 13 Defendants. * ** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-00524-RCJ-WGC ORDER 14 15 The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 16 (ECF #17) entered on August 7, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny 17 Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal and/or Remand (ECF #11), grant Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for 18 Summary Judgment (ECF #15) and affirm the decision of the ALJ. The Court has considered the 19 pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review 20 and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, 21 and good cause appearing, the court hereby 22 23 ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF #17). 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal and/or Remand (ECF #11) 25 is DENIED. 26 /// /// 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #15) is GRANTED, and the decision of the ALJ is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of August, 2014. 4 5 6 _______________________________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?