Shengdatech Liquidating Trust v. Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell, P.C. et al
Filing
28
ORDERED that the # 17 Motion to Amend and the # 18 Motion to Join are GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the motion hearing currently set for Monday, June 2, 2014 is VACATED . Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
SHENGDATECH LIQUIDATING TRUST,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
HANSEN, BARNETT, & MAXWELL, P.C. et )
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )
3:13-cv-00563-RCJ
ORDER
17
18
Chapter 11 Debtor and Plaintiff Shengdatech Liquidating Trust (“SLT”) brought an adversary
19
proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court against Defendants Hansen, Barnett, & Maxwell, P.C. (“HBM”),
20
KPMG LLP (“KMPG US”), Baker Tilly International Limited (“Baker Tilly”), and KPMG
21
International Cooperative (“KMPG IC”) for: (1)–(3) professional negligence and malpractice; (4)
22
breach of contract; and (5) fraudulent transfer. The KMPG Defendants asked the Court to withdraw
23
the reference under 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). The Court granted the motion over Plaintiff’s objection.
24
The Court has approved a settlement between Plaintiff and KMPG Defendants. Currently
25
pending before the Court are a joint motion to amend the Complaint and a joint motion to join a
26
Defendant. No party has objected to either motion, and one of the two remaining Defendants has
27
filed a notice of non-opposition.
28
///
1
2
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend (ECF No. 17) and the Motion to Join
3
(ECF No. 18) are GRANTED.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion hearing currently set on Monday, June 2,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2014 is VACATED.
DATED: This ORDERED.
IT IS SO 28th day of May, 2014.
5
6
7
_________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?