Feldman v. Baca et al

Filing 5

ORDER - Petitioner shall file an application for leave to proceed IFP accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account. The Clerk shall send forms to petitioner (mailed 10/22/2013). In the alternative, petitioner shall pay the filing fee of $5, accompanied by a copy of this order. Petitioner shall have 30 days to comply (due by 11/21/2013). Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 BENJAMIN J. FELDMAN, 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 Case No. 3:13-cv-00566-RCJ-WGC MR. BACA, et al., 13 ORDER Respondents. 14 15 Petitioner has submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. 16 He has not submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. He has submitted a letter (#3) 17 stating that the filing fee was enclosed, but in fact the fee was not enclosed. Petitioner will need to 18 resolve the financial situation before the action may proceed. 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED petitioner shall file an application for leave to proceed in 20 forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account. 21 The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a blank application form for incarcerated litigants. In the 22 alternative, petitioner shall make the necessary arrangements to pay the filing fee of five dollars 23 ($5.00), accompanied by a copy of this order. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date 24 that this order is entered to comply. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action. 25 Dated: This 22ndday of October, 2013. Dated: This 17th day of October, 2013. 26 27 28 _________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?