Robert A. Slovak vs Golf Course Villas Homeowners Association, et al
Filing
350
ORDER- The emergency motion to continue hearing, (ECF No. 341 ), is GRANTED. The Court's minute order, (ECF No. 349 ), is hereby VACATED. Slovak shall have until August 23, 2021 to file an opposition to Wells Fargo' s motion to exclude witnesses. (ECF No. 338 .) Wells Fargo shall file a reply no later than August 30, 2021. No extensions of time to file either document will be granted for any reason. Both parties are ordered to email any document(s) and accompanying attachments and/or exhibits that are electronically filed via CM/ECF in this case directly to their opposing counsel between now and the rescheduled hearing date to ensure that all documents are received by the opposing party. The in-pe rson evidentiary is hearing is set for October 14 & 15, 2021. If there are any conflicts with this date, the parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy, Lisa Mann, at 775-686-5653 on or before August 23, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 8/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)
Case 3:13-cv-00569-MMD-CLB Document 350 Filed 08/17/21 Page 1 of 2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
ROBERT SLOVAK,
Case No. 3:13-CV-0569-MMD-CLB
5
6
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY
MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING
v.
[ECF No. 341]
7
GOLF COURSE VILLAS
HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
10
Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Slovak’s (“Slovak”) emergency motion to continue
11
evidentiary hearing. (ECF No. 341.) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) responded
12
to the motion. (ECF No. 345.)
13
The Court has thoroughly reviewed the motion to extend time, (ECF No. 341), and
14
has conducted its own research related to the alleged claims that documents filed on the
15
Court’s Case Management Electronic Filing System (“CM/ECF”) system were not
16
properly served upon counsel at the time of filing. Based on the Court’s review, it appears
17
that due to technical issues with CM/ECF, the motion to exclude witnesses, (ECF No.
18
338), may not have been properly served by CM/ECF at the time of filing. It also appears
19
that similar issues may have affected Wells Fargo’s ability to access documents filed by
20
Slovak. Moreover, upon further review, the Court finds that it would be impossible for it to
21
properly consider and thoroughly review Wells Fargo’s motion to exclude in time to
22
provide both parties and their witnesses sufficient notice to make (or cancel) necessary
23
travel arrangements given the lateness of the filings and scheduled time for the upcoming
24
evidentiary hearing.
25
26
27
28
Therefore, in light of the above, the Court finds it must continue the currently
scheduled evidentiary hearing.
Case 3:13-cv-00569-MMD-CLB Document 350 Filed 08/17/21 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Therefore, the Court orders as follows:
1.
The emergency motion to continue hearing, (ECF No. 341), is GRANTED.
2.
The Court’s minute order, (ECF No. 349), is hereby VACATED.
3.
Slovak shall have until August 23, 2021 to file an opposition to Wells
Fargo’s motion to exclude witnesses. (ECF No. 338.) Wells Fargo shall file a reply no
later than August 30, 2021. No extensions of time to file either document will be granted
for any reason.
4.
Both parties are ordered to email any document(s) and accompanying
attachments and/or exhibits that are electronically filed via CM/ECF in this case directly
10
11
12
13
14
15
to their opposing counsel between now and the rescheduled hearing date to ensure that
all documents are received by the opposing party.
5.
The in-person evidentiary is hearing is set for October 14 & 15, 2021. If
there are any conflicts with this date, the parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy, Lisa
Mann, at 775-686-5653 on or before August 23, 2021.
16
17
18
19
August 17, 2021
DATED: ______________.
______
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?