Robert A. Slovak vs Golf Course Villas Homeowners Association, et al

Filing 350

ORDER- The emergency motion to continue hearing, (ECF No. 341 ), is GRANTED. The Court's minute order, (ECF No. 349 ), is hereby VACATED. Slovak shall have until August 23, 2021 to file an opposition to Wells Fargo' s motion to exclude witnesses. (ECF No. 338 .) Wells Fargo shall file a reply no later than August 30, 2021. No extensions of time to file either document will be granted for any reason. Both parties are ordered to email any document(s) and accompanying attachments and/or exhibits that are electronically filed via CM/ECF in this case directly to their opposing counsel between now and the rescheduled hearing date to ensure that all documents are received by the opposing party. The in-pe rson evidentiary is hearing is set for October 14 & 15, 2021. If there are any conflicts with this date, the parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy, Lisa Mann, at 775-686-5653 on or before August 23, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 8/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)

Download PDF
Case 3:13-cv-00569-MMD-CLB Document 350 Filed 08/17/21 Page 1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 ROBERT SLOVAK, Case No. 3:13-CV-0569-MMD-CLB 5 6 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING v. [ECF No. 341] 7 GOLF COURSE VILLAS HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Slovak’s (“Slovak”) emergency motion to continue 11 evidentiary hearing. (ECF No. 341.) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) responded 12 to the motion. (ECF No. 345.) 13 The Court has thoroughly reviewed the motion to extend time, (ECF No. 341), and 14 has conducted its own research related to the alleged claims that documents filed on the 15 Court’s Case Management Electronic Filing System (“CM/ECF”) system were not 16 properly served upon counsel at the time of filing. Based on the Court’s review, it appears 17 that due to technical issues with CM/ECF, the motion to exclude witnesses, (ECF No. 18 338), may not have been properly served by CM/ECF at the time of filing. It also appears 19 that similar issues may have affected Wells Fargo’s ability to access documents filed by 20 Slovak. Moreover, upon further review, the Court finds that it would be impossible for it to 21 properly consider and thoroughly review Wells Fargo’s motion to exclude in time to 22 provide both parties and their witnesses sufficient notice to make (or cancel) necessary 23 travel arrangements given the lateness of the filings and scheduled time for the upcoming 24 evidentiary hearing. 25 26 27 28 Therefore, in light of the above, the Court finds it must continue the currently scheduled evidentiary hearing. Case 3:13-cv-00569-MMD-CLB Document 350 Filed 08/17/21 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Therefore, the Court orders as follows: 1. The emergency motion to continue hearing, (ECF No. 341), is GRANTED. 2. The Court’s minute order, (ECF No. 349), is hereby VACATED. 3. Slovak shall have until August 23, 2021 to file an opposition to Wells Fargo’s motion to exclude witnesses. (ECF No. 338.) Wells Fargo shall file a reply no later than August 30, 2021. No extensions of time to file either document will be granted for any reason. 4. Both parties are ordered to email any document(s) and accompanying attachments and/or exhibits that are electronically filed via CM/ECF in this case directly 10 11 12 13 14 15 to their opposing counsel between now and the rescheduled hearing date to ensure that all documents are received by the opposing party. 5. The in-person evidentiary is hearing is set for October 14 & 15, 2021. If there are any conflicts with this date, the parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy, Lisa Mann, at 775-686-5653 on or before August 23, 2021. 16 17 18 19 August 17, 2021 DATED: ______________. ______ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?