Robert A. Slovak vs Golf Course Villas Homeowners Association, et al

Filing 469

ORDER - Plaintiff Robert Slovak's motion to seal (ECF No. 387 ) and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's motion to seal (ECF No. 410 ) are granted. The parties will have seven days from the date of this order to file an unsealed redacted version, absent protected information, of their relevant filings on the docket (by 5/11/2022). Slovak's Objection (ECF No. 388 ) is overruled. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/4/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

Case 3:13-cv-00569-MMD-CLB Document 469 Filed 05/04/22 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

ROBERT A. SLOVAK,

Case No. 3:13-cv-00569-MMD-CLB
Plaintiff,

v.

7
8

ORDER

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.

9
10
11

In reviewing the docket, the Court observes that Plaintiff Robert Slovak’s objection

12

(ECF Nos. 388 (“Objection”), 388-1, 388-2) to United States Magistrate Judge Carla L.

13

Baldwin’s October 22, 2021 order (ECF No. 385) remains outstanding. Slovak’s Objection

14

is accompanied by a motion to seal (ECF No. 387) because the Objection contains

15

individually identifiable health information. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a

16

response and attached a motion to seal. (ECF Nos. 410, 411.) Good cause appearing, the

17

Court grants both parties’ motions to seal. However, the parties are directed to file an

18

unsealed version of their relevant filings with the health information redacted within seven

19

days from this order.

20

Additionally, the Court overrules the Objection as moot because no further action

21

is required by the parties pursuant to the Court’s February 2, 2022 order (ECF No. 449).

22

(See ECF No. 468.) Even if the Court had timely addressed the Objection, having review

23

the parties’ arguments and the pertinent records, the Court nevertheless finds that Judge

24

Baldwin did not commit clear error when she issued her order on October 22, 2021. See

25

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

26

///

27

///

28

///

Case 3:13-cv-00569-MMD-CLB Document 469 Filed 05/04/22 Page 2 of 2

1
2

It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff Robert Slovak’s motion to seal (ECF No. 387)
and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank’s motion to seal (ECF No. 410) are granted.

3

It is further ordered that the parties will have seven days from the date of this order

4

to file an unsealed redacted version, absent protected information, of their relevant filings

5

on the docket.

6

It is further ordered that Slovak’s Objection (ECF No. 388) is overruled.

7

DATED THIS 4th Day of May 2022.

8
9
10
11

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2