Pinder v. Baker et al

Filing 55

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 3/17/2015, denying Plaintiff's 53 Motion to Re-Hear Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Prison [Copy] Work Limit. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

VINCENT H. PINDER,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
)
)
Defendants
)
________________________________________)

3:13-cv-00572-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
March 17, 2015

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:

KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Re-Hear Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Prison [Copy]
Work Limit.” (Doc. # 53.) Plaintiff seeks the court to reconsider its prior order extending Plaintiff’s
copy work limit by only $10.00. (Doc. # 51). Plaintiff instead seeks the court to grant a $50.00
extension of his copy work limit. (Doc. # 53.)
Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. # 54.) Defendants state:
“In his motion, Plaintiff does not state that he has used up the $10.00 copy
work extension previously granted to him by the court. In fact, Ely State Prison law
library records show that Plaintiff’s copy work limit is only at $78.40 out of an
available $110. (Exhibit A). It appears then that Plaintiff has not depleted the original
$100 allotted by AR 722.12, let alone the $10.00 extension granted by the court.
Plaintiff has not shown that another extension is needed.”
(Id., at 2.)
The court does not perceive a need at this time to further extend Plaintiff’s copy work limit.
Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. # 53) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk