Burriola v. Baca

Filing 36

ORDER - GRANTING ECF No. 35 Motion for Clarification. Petitioner has until September 7, 2016 to file and serve a reply to respondents' answer (ECF No. 33 ). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9

ANTHONY BURRIOLA,

10

Petitioner,

11

vs.

12

Case No. 3:13-cv-00574-RCJ-VPC

ISIDRO BACA, et al.,

13

ORDER

Respondents.

14
15

Petitioner has filed a motion for clarification (ECF No. 35). He purports to be confused by

16

the court’s granting respondents additional time to file an answer, because the order (ECF No. 32)

17

stated nothing about the time to file a reply to the answer. When, as here, the court states nothing

18

about an already existing deadline, then the order has no effect on that deadline. Petitioner had

19

forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer (ECF No. 33) to file a reply. The court

20

will give petitioner some additional time to file his reply.

21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for clarification (ECF No. 35) is

22

GRANTED. Petitioner will have fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this order to file and

23

serve a reply to respondents’ answer (ECF No. 33).

24

Dated:

August 23, 2016

25
26
27
28

_________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge