Sierra Development Company v. Chartwell Advisory Group Ltd.
Filing
711
ORDER granting ECF No. 710 Stipulation: The Deadline for the Parties to submit any motions for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and/or any requests for costs pursuant to Local Rule 54-1 shall be extended to October 12, 2018. No more extensions. Signed by District Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534
TLB@pisanellibice.com
Dustun H. Holmes, Esq., Bar No. 12776
DHH@pisanellibice.com
Robert A. Ryan, Esq., Bar No. 12084
RR@pisanellibice.com
PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: 702.214.2100
Facsimile: 702.214.2100
Attorneys for Pioneer Hotel, Inc.,
Mandalay Resort Group, MGM Resorts International,
MSE Investments, Inc., Gold Strike Investments, Inc.,
Newcastle Corp., and Ramparts, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
PISANELLI BICE
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
11
12
SIERRA DEVELOPMENT CO. d/b/a CLUB
CAL NEVA,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
CHARTWELL ADVISORY GROUP, LTD.
18
19
20
XXXXXXXXX
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILE
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND
COSTS AND TO SUBMIT BILL OF
COSTS
Defendant.
16
17
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00602-RTB-VPC
(SIXTH REQUEST)
CHARTWELL ADVISORY GROUP, LTD.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
SIERRA DEVELOPMENT CO., et al.,
Counterclaim Defendants.
21
22
23
Defendant/Counterclaimant Chartwell Advisory Group, LTD. ("Chartwell"), Counterclaim
24
Defendant Pioneer Hotel, Inc. ("Pioneer"); Counterclaim Defendants Mandalay Resort Group,
25
MGM Resorts International, MSE Investments, Inc., Gold Strike Investments, Inc.,
26
Newcastle Corp. and Ramparts, Inc. (collectively, the "Mandalay Parties"); Counterclaim
27
Defendants Harrah's Las Vegas, LLC, Harrah's Laughlin, LLC and Rio Properties, LLC
28
(collectively, the "Harrah's Parties" and together with Pioneer and the Mandalay Parties as
1
1
"Counterclaim Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as
2
Follows:
3
1.
4
5
6
7
On July 6, 2018, this Court entered its Memorandum Decision following the
Bench Trial in this case. [ECF No. 689]
2.
That same day, the clerk of the Court entered Judgment in accordance with this
Court's Memorandum Decision. [ECF No. 690]
3.
Based on these dates, any motions for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to
8
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and/or requests for taxable costs under Local Rule 54-1 would have been due
9
within fourteen (14) days, or by July 20, 2018.
10
4.
On July 19, 2018, the Parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend the
PISANELLI BICE
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
11
July 20, 2018 deadline to August 3, 2018 so the Parties could explore the possibility of resolution
12
[ECF No. 691].
13
5.
The Court granted this Stipulation on July 27, 2018. [ECF No. 695]
14
6.
On August 1, 2018, the parties sought an additional two week extension of the
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
August 3, 2018 date as negotiations were ongoing. [ECF No. 692]
7.
Again, on August 15, 2018, the parties sought another two week extension to
August 31, 2018. [ECF No. 698]
8.
On August 30, 2018, the parties sought an additional two week extension to
September 14, 2018 (the “August 30 Stipulation”). [ECF No. 703]
9.
On September 4, 2018, this Court granted the parties August 30 Stipulation.
[ECF No. 704]
10.
On September 13, 2018, the parties sought another two week extension to September
28, 2018. [ECF No. 707]
11.
The Parties have reached a resolution, but out of an abundance of caution, the parties
25
seek to extend the deadline for an additional two weeks in order to finalize the settlement
26
documents.
27
28
12.
As such, the parties request an additional two-week extension of time to file any
motions for attorneys' fees and costs under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and/or any requests for taxable
2
1
costs under Local Rule 54-1, such that all such motions and requests would be due on or before
2
October 12, 2018.
3
13.
4
DATED this 28th day of September, 2018.
The Parties request this extension in good faith and not for any dilatory motive.
5
PISANELLI BICE PLLC
DILWORTH PAXSON LLP
6
By:
By:
7
8
9
10
PISANELLI BICE
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
11
12
/s/ Todd L. Bice
Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534
Dustun H. Holmes, Esq., Bar No. 12776
Robert A. Ryan, Esq., Bar No. 12084
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
15
16
17
18
19
20
Calvin R.X. Dunlap, Esq., Bar No. 2111
Monique Laxalt, Esq., Bar No. 1969
DUNLAP & LAXALT
537 Ralston Street
Reno, Nevada 89503
Attorneys for Counterclaim Defendants
Mandalay Resort Group, MGM Resorts
International, MSE Investments, Inc., Gold
Strike Investments, Inc., Newcastle Corp., and Attorneys for Chartwell Advisory Group, Ltd.
Ramparts, Inc.
13
14
/s/ Joshua D. Wolson
Joshua D. Wolson, Esq. (pro hac vice)
1500 Market Street, Suite 3500E
Philadelphia, PA 19102
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
By:
/s/ Michael Feder
Michael N. Feder, Esq., Bar No. 7332
Joel Z. Schwarz, Esq., Bar No. 9181
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
Attorneys
for
Caesars
Entertainment
Corporation, Harrah's Las Vegas, LLC,
Harrah's Laughlin, LLC, Rio Properties, LLC,
Golden Nugget, Inc., GNLV Corp., and Golden
Nugget Hotels and Casinos
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
2
3
ORDER
Based upon the Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
4
The Deadline for the Parties to submit any motions for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to
5
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and/or any requests for costs pursuant to Local Rule 54-1 shall be extended to
6
October 12, 2018.
7
No more extensions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
DATED: October 3, 2018
PISANELLI BICE
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?